GOPAL DASS THRU. BROTHER ANAND VIR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A 8 [2011] 3 S.C.R. 856 GOPAL DASS THRU. BROTHER ANAND VIR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 16 of 2008) MARCH 14, 2011 [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: C Article 32 - Writ petition seeking direction to the Union of India to take steps for release of writ petitioner from jail in Pakistan - HELD: Supreme Court of India, for lack of jurisdiction, cannot give any direction to Pakistan authorities - Government of India on its own has been taking steps in D this regard - However, the Court requests the Pakistan authorities to consider the appeal of the petitioner for remitting the remaining period of sentence and release him (as well as other similar mdian prisoners) in the humanitarian spirit - Pakistan Official Secrets Act, 1923 - s. 5913. E The petitioner, an Indian national, was awarded life sentence u/s 59/3 of the Pakistan Official Secrets Act, 1923, by Field General Count Martial in Pakistan on 27.12.1986, and since then was in jail in that country. The instant writ petition was filed seeking a direction to Union F of India to take immediate steps for his release and repatriation. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, it was stated that Government of India under an agreement was continually pursuing the issue of release of Indian G prisoners in jails in Pakistan. Disposing of the petition, the Court H 856 GOPAL DASS THRU. BROTHER ANAND VIR v. 857 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. HELD: A This Court, for lack of jurisdiction, cannot give any directions to Pakistan authorities. However, the Court can make a request to the Pakistan authorities to consider the appeal of the petitioner for releasing him on humanitarian 8 grounds by remitting the remaining part of his sentence as he has served almost 27 years in jail. Recently, on the request of delegations of both India and Pakistan, the Pakistan Supreme Court, ordered release of 442 Indian prisoners languishing in Pakistan jails. (The Pakistan C Supreme Court deserves to be commended in this connection). They requested for slmilar release of Pakistani prisoners in Indian jails, and the Indian Government generously reciprocated the gesture by releasing many Pakistani prisoners in our jails. Thus there 0 is a humanitarian spirit 6n both sides, which this Court applauds. Accordingly, this Court reques~ the Pakistan authorities to consider the appeal of the petitioner for remitting the remaining period of sentence and release him (as well as other similarly Indian prisoners) in the same spirit. [Para 8,9, 11-13) (859-H; 860-A-B; E-H; E 861-A-E] CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition ยท(Criminal) No. 16 of 2008. Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Saurabh Mishra, Arvind Kr. Sharma for the Petitioner. P.P. Malhotra, T.A. Khan, Anand Verma, Anil Katiyar for F lthe Respondents. G The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MARKANDEY KAT JU, J. "Qafas udaas hai yaaron sabaa se kuch to kaho H 858 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 3 S.C.R. A Kaheen to beher-e-khuda aaj zikr-e-yaar chale" - FAIZ AHMED FAIZ 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a direction to the respondent, B Union of India, to take immediate and necessary steps for release and repatriation of the petitioner, who is allegedly detained in the Lahore Central Jail in Pakistan, through the diplomatic channel of the Ministry of External .Affairs, c D Government of India, New Delhi. 2. It is alleged by the petitioner that he is an Indian national. He was intercepted and arrested by the Pakistan Border Security Force in July 1984 when he alleged to have mistakenly crossed over the lndo-Pakistan border into Pakistan. 3. The petitioner was tried by a Field General Court Martial at Sialkot Cantonment in Pakistan and was awarded life sentenee on 27.12.1986 under Section 59/3 of the Pakistan Official Secrets Act, 1923. The said sentence was confirmed by Brigadier Mallik, Commander, 10th Brigade. He was lodged E in different jails, and presently is allegedly in Mianwali Jail in Pakistan. 4. It is alleged that due to the petitioner's detention his whole family is suffering from the year 1986. His brother, F through whom this petition has been filed, made several representations to the concerned authorities of the Government of India requesting them
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex