LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

GENERAL MANAGER, UTTARANCHAL JAL SANSTHAN versus LAXMI DEVI AND OTHERS.

Citation: [2009] 9 S.C.R. 791 · Decided: 15-05-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.B. SINHA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 3 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2009] 9 S.C.R. 791 
"' 
-+ 
GENERAL MANAGER, UTTARANCHAL JAL SANSTHAN 
A 
v. 
LAXMI DEVI AND OTHERS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 3605 of 2009) 
MAY 15, 2009 
B 
[5.8. SINHA AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.] 
~ 
Service Law: 
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Govenment c 
Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 
., 
"Β· 2 (a) (iii) and 5 - Daily wage employees - Death of, 
while in service - Claim for compassionate appointment -
. Held: Daily wage employees' are not covered in the definition 
of 'Government employees' - Rendition of service for a long 
D 
,.. " 
time does not confer permanency - Deceased employees 
were neither in permanent cadre nor were they appointed on 
a temporary basis - Judgments of High Court directing the 
department to consider the claims of writ petitioners for 
compassionate appointments set aside. 
E 
Constitution of India, 1950 
'f 
Articles 14 and 16 - Appointment on a regular vacancy 
, 
- Held: A regular vacancy cannot be filled up except in terms 
of recruitment rules as also on compliance of the 
F 
constitutional scheme of Enquality - Article 14 carries with it 
a positive effect - Equality clause cannot apply in a case of 
illegality - A circular cannot prevail over statutory rules - Uttar. 
Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants 
Dying In Harness Rules, 197 4 - Uttaranchal Public Works 
I 
,,--I 
G' 
β€’ 
Department circular. dated 21.3.2002 . 
Judgment: 
Retrospective operation of judgment - Held: JudiCial 
.. 
791 
H 
792 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009] 9 S.C.R. 
A decisions unless otherwise specified, are retrospective in 
operation. 
The husband of the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 
3065 of 2009 and the father of the respondent Β·in Civil 
8 Appeal No. 3606 of 2009 worked on daily wage basis in 
U.P. Jal Sansthan. They were transferred to Kumaun Jal 
Sansthan on 16.4~1991 and 1.10.1990 respectively. They 
died in such service. The respond,ents made 
representations for compassionate appointment which 
was declined by the Department. However, the High 
C Court directed to consider their cases for appointment. 
Aggrieved, the Department filed the appeals. Β· 
It was contended for the respondents thatJn view of 
Clause (3) of r.2 (a) of the U.P. Recruitment of Dependents 
D of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 197 4, 
the deceased employees having rendered more than 3 
years continue service were Government servants and, 
further the Uttaranchal Public Works Department Circular 
dated 
21.3.2002 
provided 
for 
compassionate 
E appointments on daily wage to dependents of such daily 
rated workers who had rendered 10 years of such service 
prior to their death while in service. 
Allowing the appeals, the Court held: 
F 
HELD: 1.1~ Daily wage employees are not covered in 
the definition of Government employees and, therefore, 
in their case question of applicability of the Uttar Pradesh 
Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants 
Dying in Harness Rules, 197 4 does not arise. Before a 
G person can claim status of a Government servant, not 
only his appointment must be made in terms of the 
recruitment rules, but he must also otherwise fulfill the 
criterion therefor. Appointment made in violation of the 
constitutional scheme is a nullity. Rendition of service for 
H a long time does not confer permanency. It is furthermore 
y 
t 
GENERALMANAGER,UTTARANCHALJALSANSTHANv. 793 
LAXMI DEVI AND ORS. 
not a mode of appointment. [Para 24, 27 and 28] [807-G-
A 
H; 808-F-H] 
1.2. Indisputably having regard to the equality clause 
contained in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of 
India, whether the appointment is in a regular vacancy or 
8 
not is essentially a qusetion of fact. Existence of a regular 
vacancy would mean a vacancy which occurred in a post 
sanctioned by the competent authority. For the said 
purpose, the cadre strength of the category to which the 
post belongs is required to be taken into consideration. c 
A regular vacancy is which arises within the cadre 
strength. It is a trite law that a regular vacancy cannot be 
filled up except in terms of the recruitment rules as also 
upon compliance of the constitutional scheme of 
equality. [Para 16] [801-F-H; 802-A] 
0 
Secretary, State of Kamataka vs. Uma Devi (3) 2006 (4) 
SCC 1; Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Workmen 
2007 (1) SCC 408; National Institute of Technology vs. Niraj 
Kumar Singh 2007 (2) SCC 481; I. G. (Karmik) vs. Prahalad 
Mani Tripathi 2007 (6) SCC 162; State Bank of I

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.