LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

GEDDAM JHANSI & ANR. versus THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1 · Decided: 06-02-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.V. NAGARATHNA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 1 : 2025 INSC 160
Geddam Jhansi & Anr. 
v. 
The State of Telangana & Ors.
(Criminal Appeal No. 609 of 2025)
07 February 2025
[B.V. Nagarathna and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant(s) under 
Sections 498A, 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4, 
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Protection of Women from Domestic 
Violence Act, 2005 ought to be quashed.
Headnotes†
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing – Penal 
Code, 1860 – ss.498A, 506 – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – 
ss.3, 4 – Complainant made specific allegations against her 
husband and her mother-in-law for demand of dowry and 
harassment – However, as regards the appellants (complainant’s 
mother-in-law’s younger sister and her son), the allegation was 
that they pressurized her to act according to her husband and 
her mother-in-law’s wishes – High Court declined to quash 
criminal proceedings against the appellants – Challenge to:
Held: Impugned judgements set aside – Charges against the 
accused including the appellants were sought to be substantiated 
based on the statements of the complainant, her parents and two 
panchayat elders – Complainant in her complaints did not assign 
any specific role to the appellants concerning cruelty, the demands 
of dowry or her physical and mental harassment except for making 
a sweeping allegation without specific details – Nothing on record 
to show that the parents or the two witnesses witnessed any of 
the incidents of physical harassment of the complainant at the 
instance of the appellants – Statements of the Panchayat elder is 
based on the information provided by the complainant’s father and 
is hearsay evidence – No prima facie case made out against the 
appellants for continuing the criminal proceedings against them 
in the trial – Pending criminal proceedings quashed qua the two 
appellants – Constitution of India – Article 142. [Paras 37, 23, 40]
* Author
2
[2025] 3 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
Matrimonial/domestic disputes – Criminalisation of domestic 
disputes, effect on the institution of family – Tendency 
to implicate family members/relatives – Duty of Court, 
discussed – In criminal cases of domestic violence, complaints 
and charges to be specific. [Paras 31-35]
Case Law Cited
State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Ors. [1992] Supp. 
3 SCR 735 : (1992) 1 Supp. SCC 335; Anand Kumar Mohatta 
v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2018] 13 SCR 1028 : (2019) 11 SCC 
706 – referred to.
List of Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860; Dowry 
Prohibition Act, 1961; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence 
Act, 2005.
List of Keywords
Quashing; Cruelty; Demand for dowry; Physical and mental 
Harassment; Domestic violence; Harassment; Criminal intimidation; 
Panchayat witnesses; Identical statements of the witnesses; 
Generalised allegations; Matrimonial/domestic disputes; Criminal 
cases relating to domestic violence; Tendency to implicate family 
members/relatives; Institution of family; Abuse of the process of 
the law; Charge-sheet; Hearsay evidence.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 
609 of 2025
From the Judgment and Order dated 04.04.2022 of the High Court 
for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in CRLP No. 3105 of 2022
With
Criminal Appeal No. 610 of 2025
Appearances for Parties
Nitin Tambwekar, Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Shaik Mohammad 
Haneef, Abdul Mannan, Irshad Ahmad, Advs. for the Appellants.
Ms. Devina Sehgal, Vineet George, Beno Bencigar, Parijat Kishore, 
Advs. for the Respondents.
[2025] 3 S.C.R. 
3
Geddam Jhansi & Anr. v. The State of Telangana & Ors.
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J.
1.	
Leave granted in both the SLPs.
2.	
This common order disposes of both the Criminal Appeals arising out 
of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9556 of 2022 and Special 
Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 428 of 2024 as both these appeals 
relate to similar and connected incidents. 
3.	
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9556 of 2022 was filed against 
the judgement and order dated 04.04.2022 passed by the Ld. Single 
Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana in Criminal Petition 
No. 3105 of 2022 whereunder the High Court declined to quash the 
criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 46 of 2022 under Section 498A, 
506 Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and Sections 3 and 4 of the 
Dowry Prohibition Act, 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.