LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

FRICK INDIA LTD. AND ANR. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation: [1994] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 134 · Decided: 13-05-1994 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.N. VENKATACHALIAH · Disposal: Case Allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
FRICK INDIA LTD. AND ANR. 
v. 
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. 
MAY 13, 1994 
B 
[M.N. VENKATACHALIAH,.CJ., A.M. AHMADI, J.S. VERMA, 
G.N. RAY AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ.] 
Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973/Central .Sales Tax Act, 1956 : 
Section 6,25(5}-Notice dated 12.2.1986-Purchase tcw-Levy of interest on 
C additional amount found due-Held: the amount of interest collected from · 
assessees to be refunded with interest at 12% per annum. 
D 
The petitioners filed the writ petitions challenging· the levy of 
interest on the purchase tax under the Haryana General . Sales Tax Act, 
1973. 
Allowing the writ petition In view of the decision In J.K. Synthetics 
case*, this Court. 
HELD : The amount of Interest levied on collected from the 
petitioners under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 as well as the 
E 
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 shall be refunded to the petitioners with 
Interest at 12% per annum from the date of actual recovery till refund. 
[135-B·CJ 
F 
*J.K Synthetics Ltd. v. The Commercial Taxes Officer, [1994) 4 SCC 
277, applied. 
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ petition (C) No. 1235 of 
1986. 
. 
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. 
G 
Harish N. Salve Ashok Sen, Ravider Narain, Ms.·Amrita Mitra, D.N. 
Misra, for JBD & Co., Ms. Meenakshi Grover, Ms. Poonarn Madan, 
Krishna Kumar, Bhaskar Raj Pradhan for Khaitan & Co., A.P. Dhamija, 
S. Atreya, N.D.B. Raju, S.K. Jain, Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Ms Ayes~a Khatri, 
Ms. Indu Malhotra, Ms. Kusum Chaudhary and Aruneshwar Gupta for the 
H appearing parties. · 
134 
FRICKINDIALTD. v. STATEOFHARYANA[AHMADl,l.] 
135 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
AHMADI, J. In view of the decision rendered by the Constitution 
Benchin/.K Synthetics Ltd v. The Commercial Taxes Officer(CivilAppeal 
Nos. 3414-16/82, decided on May 9, 1994), since the relevant provisions of 
A 
the Haryana General Sales Tax Act are analogous to those of the Rajasthan 
Sales Tax Act, this plllitiqn must also succeed. We, therefore, allow this B 
petition and direct that the amount of interest levied and collected from 
the petitioners under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act as well as the 
Central Sales Tax Act shall be refunded to the petitioners within three 
months from today with interest at 12% per annum from the date of actual 
recovery till refund. There will, however, be no order as to costs in the facts C 
and circumstances of the case. CMP will also stand disposed of. 
R.P. 
Petition allowed.