LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

EXTRA JUDL. EXEC. VICTIM FAMILIES ASSN. & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2017] 11 S.C.R. 363 · Decided: 14-07-2017 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MADAN B. LOKUR · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2017] l 1 S.C.R. 363 
EXTRA JUDL. EXEC. VICTIM FAMILIES ASSN. & ANR. 
A 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
(Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 129 of 2012) 
JULYl4,2017 
[MADAN B. LOKUR AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.] 
Constitution oflndia -Art.21 and 32- Fake encounter killings 
- Use of excessive Jl>rce or retaliulo(V force b.v police personnel 
and perso1111el in uniform of the armedforces in the State of Manipur 
- Wiit petition alleging that I 528 persons killed in fake encounters 
- Documentation found inadequate to order any inquiry into 
allegations made - issuance of direction lo complete the 
documen/ation - information collected with regard to 655 deaths 
out of i 528 alleged. wherein deaths were investigated by 
Commissions of inquiry, Judicial Inquiries, High Court, NHRC. and 
Justice Santosh Hegde Commission and registration of FIRs was 
directed in these complaints - Issuance of direction to CBI lo 
constitute a Special Invesligation Team lo investigate the alleged 
ex/ra judicial killings in Manipur - Officers of the Manipur Police 
not associaled with Special Invesligaling Team, since in some of /he 
cases the role of the Manipur Police itself has been adversely 
con1111e11ted upon. 
Administration of Justice - Fake encounter killings - Petition 
al the instance of third party, next of the kin having lhemse/ves 
given a quietus to the incidents - Maintainability of-Held: It cannot 
be said that the Court cannot take up the issue at the instance of a 
third parzv - Access to justice is certainly a human right and it has 
been given a special place in the constitutional scheme where free 
legal aid and advice is provided to a large number of people in the 
co11111ry - To provide access to justice to every citizen and to make 
it meaning(td. lhis Court has evolved its public interest jurisprudence 
- In the instant petitions, the next of kin could not access justice in 
the local courts and the petitioners took up their cause in public 
interest - Constitutional j11rispn1dence does not permit to shut the 
door on such persons and the constitutional obligation requires to 
give justice a11d succour to the next of kin of the deceased. 
363 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
364 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
G 
H 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2017] 11 S.C.R. 
('01n11e11:β€’;ation - lΒ·'ake encounter killing.r,Β· -
("on11Jensation, 
whether an appropriate relief - Held: Compensation having bee11 
paid lo the next of kin fiJr the unfortunate deaths, it ca1111ot he said 
that it may be 110/ necessaty to proceed further in the matter -
c:o11111e11sation has been lll1'Β£1r,ietf tu the next of kin for the agon.v 
they have sujfeted and ro enable them lo immediately tide over their 
loss and jiJr thrir relwbilitution - This cannot override the law of 
the land. othe1twise all heinous crimes would gel sellled through 
payment of moneta1y compensation - Constillllional jurisprudence 
does not pern1it this and certain/)' cannot encourage ur countenance 
such a vie-iv. 
Delay/Laches - Fake encounter killings - Some of the 
incidents of considerable vintage - Re-opening of the issues .fur 
investigation - Held: Crime which involves the death of a person 
who is possibly in11ocent, ca1111ot be 01β€’er-looked only because of' a 
lapse c!f' time - It was the obligation of the State to have suo motu 
conducted a thorough inqui1y at the appropriate time and soon 
after each incide11/ look place - Merely because the State has not 
1ake11 any action and has allowed rime to go by, it cannot take 
tu/vantage of the clela,,v to .\-cuttle an inquiry. 
Protection of Huma11 Rights Act, 1993 - Natio11al Human 
Rights Commission - lmple111e11tatio11 of its communications a11d 
Guide/i11es - Plea of NHRC that there should be implementation of 
its communicat/011s a11d Guidelines, enforceme11t of the orders passed 
by it and necessary provision for its effective fi111ctioni11g - Held: 
Intention of the NHRC is to 111ore effectively assist the crimiolc1ljustice 
delive1y system and avoid anyji1ctual controversies while reopecting 
human rights - Unless the communicatio11s and G11ideli11es laid down 
by the NHRC are adhered lo, the respect and dignity due to the 
dead and the hu111an rights of all will remain only on paper - Request 
111ade by NHRC to be expeditiously and favourably respected and 
considered by the Union of' India for the effective fimctioning of 
NHRC - Issuance of direction to Union of India to take note of the 
concerns of' the NHRC and remedy them at the earliest. 
Adjournin

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.