LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) AND ANOTHER versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

Citation: [2013] 1 S.C.R. 140 · Decided: 04-01-2013 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2013) 1 S.C.R. 140 
EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES 
ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) AND ANOTHER 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER 
(Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 129 of 2012) 
JANUARY 4, 2013 
[AFTAB ALAM AND RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, JJ.] 
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 32 - Unlawful killings 
C - Extra Judicial Execution - Writ petitions raising disquieting 
issues pertaining to the State of Manipur - Statement made 
that, over the years, large number of Indian citizens, have 
been killed by the Manipur Police and other security forces 
while they were in custody or in stage-managed encounters 
D or in ways broadly termed as 'extra-judicial executions' and 
that for a very long time, the State of Manipur is declared as 
"disturbed area" and is put under the Armed Forces (Special 
Powers) Act, 1958, subverting the civil rights of the citizens 
of the State and making it possible for the security forces to 
E kill innocent persons with impunity - Three member high 
powered commission appointed by Supreme Court to make 
thorough enquiry in the first six cases filed by the petitioners 
and record a finding regarding the past antecedents of the 
victims and the circumstances in which they were ki/led -
F State Government and all other concerned agencies directed 
to hand over to the Commission, without any delay, all 
records, materials and evidences relating to the cases, as 
directed above, for holding enquiry - It will be open to the 
Commission to take statements of witnesses in connection 
G with the enquiry conducted by it and it will be free to devise 
its own procedure for holding the enquiry - In light of the 
enquiries made by it, the Commission to also address the 
larger question of the role of the State Police and the security 
forces in Manipur - Commission to also make a report 
H 
140 
EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES 
141 
ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) v. UNION OF INDIA 
regarding the functioning of the State Police and security A 
forces in the State of Manipur and in case it finds that the 
actions of the police and/or the security forces transgress the 
legal bounds, the Commission shall make recommendations 
for keeping the police and the security forces within the legal 
bounds without compromising the fight against insurgency -
B 
Commission to give its report within twelve weeks - Central 
Government and the Government of the State of Manipur to 
extend full facilities, including manpower support and 
secretarial assistance as may be desired by the Commission 
to effectively and expeditiously carry out the task assigned to c 
it by the Court - Matter to be put up on receipt of the report 
by the Commission - Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 
1958. 
People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India and 
another (1997) 3 sec 433 - referred to. 
D 
Case Law Reference: 
(1997) 3 sec 433 
referred to 
Para 8 
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Crl.) 
E 
No. 129 of 2012. 
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. 
WITH 
Writ Petition (C) No. 445 of 2012. 
F 
Menaka Guruswamy (Amicus Curiae), Paras Kuhad, ASG, 
Colin Gonsalves, Jaideep Gupta, Ranjit Kumar, V. Giri, Bipin 
Aspatwar, Surabhi Shukla, Raeesa Vakil, Jubli, Jyoti G 
Mendiratta, Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Ashok Kumar Singh, Neeraj 
K. Sharma, Ashok Dhamija, B.K. Prasad, Khwairakpam Nobin 
Singh, Shobha, Mehak for the appearing parties. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
H 
A 
142 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2013] 1 S.C.R. 
ORDER 
1. These two writ petitions, each filed under Article 32 of 
the Constitution of India, raise some disquieting issues 
pertaining to the State of Manipur. In writ petition (criminal) 
8 No.129 of 2012, it is stated that, over the years, a large number 
of people, Indian citizens, have been killed by the Manipur 
Police and other security forces while they were in custody or 
in stage-managed encounters or in ways broadly termed as 
'extra-judicial executions'. In writ petition (civil) No.445 of 2012, 
C it is stated that for a very long time, the State of Manipur is 
declared as "disturbed area" and is put under the Armed 
Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, subverting the civil rights 
of the citizens of the State and making it possible for the 
security forces to kill innocent persons with impunity. 
D 
2. In this order, we deal with the first writ petition, i.e., writ 
petition (criminal) No.129/2012. 
3. In this writ petition it is stated that during the period May, 
1979 to May, 201

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.