LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD versus LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GADAG & ORS.

Citation: [2011] 1 S.C.R. 600 · Decided: 04-01-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.V. RAVEENDRAN · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011) 1 S.C.R. 600 
A 
EXECUTIVE ENGINEERt KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD 
v. 
B 
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GADAG & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal Nos. 51-52 of 2011) 
JANUARY 04, 2011 
ยท [R V RAVEENDRAN AND A K PATNAIK1 JJ.] 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 
c 
s. 4(1) - Land acquisition for State Housing Board -
Issuance of Notification dated 06.02.1992 - Determination of 
market value - Evidence relating to auction sales - Other sale 
transactions not applicable as they related to far away 
properties - Reference Court relying upon auction sale dated 
0 02.01.1989 of a larger plot in the vicinity, arrived at the market 
value as Rs. 4,62,4941- per acre - Compensation determined 
as Rs. 2, 17, 3721- per acre, after deducting 53% towards 
development factor - However, the High Court relied on 
auction sale dated 20. 11. 1989 of a smaller plot and arrived 
at the market value as Rs. 6, 60, 9 77 /- per acre -
E Compensation increased to Rs. 4, 42, 0001- per acre, after 
deducting 33% towards development factor- On appeal, held: 
Having regard to the proximity of location and the size of the 
acquired land, the Reference Court was justified in relying upon 
the auction sale transaction of a larger plot - On the basis of 
F the sale price disclosed by the said auction sale, the value of 
the land in question works out to Rs. 4, 62, 4941- per acre -
Deduction of 20% to be made to off-set the impact of 
competitive-hike involved in the auction sale and the market 
value per acre as on 02.01.89 would be Rs. 3,69,9951- -
G Relevant date for determination of compensation is 
06.02.1992 and the date of auction is 02.01.1989, thus, there 
being a gap of three years, appropriate appreciation has to 
be provided for - The acquired lands being within the 
municipal limits with considerable development potential, a 
H 
600 
y 
/ 
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKAHOUSING BOARD v. 601 
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, 
cumulative increase of 10% per annum for three years is 
A 
adopted - Market value as on 06.02.1992 would be Rs. 
4, 92, 4601- per acre - Having regard to the partial access to 
infrastructural facilities, a deduction of 40% towards cost of 
development is applied - Thus, rate per acre for the acquired 
land as on 06.02.1992 is determined as Rs. 2,95,4761- per B 
acre - Compensation awarded as Rs. 2,95,5001- per acre. 
Market value of acquired land - Determination of -
~ _ Comparable sale transaction - Auction Sale - Held: Element 
.. ~., 
of competition in auction sales makes them unsafe guides c 
for determining the market value - But where an open auction 
sale is the only comparable sale transaction available on 
account of proximity in situation and proximity in time to the 
acquired land, the court may with caution, rely upon the price 
disclosed by such auction sales, by providing appropriate 
D 
deduction or cut to off-set the competitive-hike in value. 
~ 
Raj Kumar v. Haryana State 2007 (7) SCC 609 - relied 
on. 
Executive Engineer (Electrical), Karnataka Power 
Transmission Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 
E 
& LAO, Gadag CA Nos.1768-1775 of 2010 decided on 
11.2.2010 - referred to. 
-+ 
Case Law Reference: 
F 
2001 (7) sec 609 
Relied on. 
Para 6 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 51-
52-of 2011. 
.. 
From the judgment & order dated 30.01.2008 of the High 
G 
~ 
Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in M.F.A. No. 7037 of 2003 
with M. F. A. GROB. No: 243 of 2004. 
WITH 
H 
602 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2011) 1 S.C.R. 
A C. A. Nos. 53-54, 55-56, 57-58, 59-60, 61-62, 63-64,71-72 & 
73-74,of 2011. 
Jagjit Singh Chhabra for the Appellant. 
8 
Mallikarjun S. Mylar, E. R. Sumathy, Anitha Shenoy for the 
Respondents. 
The order of the Court was delivered by 
R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 
c 
2. An extent of 127 acres 26 guntas of lands in Betegeri 
village .within the municipal limits of Gadag-Betegeri 
Municipality, was acquired for Karnataka Housing Board in 
pursuance of Preliminary Notification dated 6.2.1992. The Land 
D 
Acquisition Officer, Gadag, made an award dated 14.2.1997 
awarding a compensation of Rs.45,000/- per acre. 
3. On a reference being made at the instance of the land 
owners, the Reference Court, by judgment and award dated 
11.7.2003, determined the compensation for the acquired lands 
E as Rs.2, 17,372/- per acre. For this purpose, the Reference 
Court relied upon Exhibit P-2 which is a sale deed dated 
30.7.1992 executed by the Municipal Commissioner, Gadag-
Betegeri Municipality in favour of 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.