DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2013] 14 S.C.R. 565 DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA (Civil Appeal No. 9093 of 2013) OCTOBER 8, 2013 [P. SATHASIVAM, CJI AND RANJAN GOGOi, JJ.] A B Election Laws - Election Polls - Voting - Introduction of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) with Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) - Petitions seeking direction to c Election Commission of India (EC/) to introduce system of 'paper trail' with EVM - After amendment in the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, EC/ successfully used VVPAT system in the polling stations of Assembly Constituency of Nagaland - Held: System of 'paper trail' is indispensable requirement 0 of free and fair elections and for achieving confidence of the voters - EVMs with VVPA T system ensure accuracy of voting system - EC/ permitted to introduce the system in gradual stages - Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - rr. 49A to 49X, 66A, 55C, 56C, 57C and Form 17C. The appellant filed writ petition before High Court seeking writ of Mandamus directing Election Commission of India to incorporate a system of "Paper trail/Paper Receipt"_ in the Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) as a convincing proof that the EVM has rightly registered the vote cast by a voter. The petition was dismissed. Hence the present appeal. The writ petition under Article 32 also prays for writ E F of mandamus directing the respondents to effect the necessary modifications in the EVMs so as to allow the G voters to verify their respective votes and attach printers to EVMs with a facility to print the running record of the votes. The petitioner also prayed (or a direction to frame guidelines and to effect necessary amendments in the 565 H 566 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 14 S.C.R. A Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. The stand of the Election Commission was that the apprehension that EVMs could be tampered with, is baseless; and that it has been exploring the possibility of incorporating a viable Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail B (VVPAT) system as a part of presently used EVMs to make the election system more transparent. Election Commission also filed Status Report on the developments of WPAT system. c Disposing of the appeal and the petition, the Court HELD: 1. It is seen from the records that after various deliberations with the experts and persons concerned with the technology, the Technical Experts Committee approved the final design of WPAT units in its meeting held on 19.01.2013. In order to meet the directions of this D Court and for proper execution of VVPAT system, the Eh~ction Commission of lndia(ECI) in its letter dated 28.03.2013, addressed to the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice stated that necessary ground work for amendment to the Conduct E of Election Rules, 1961 (in relevant parts in Rules 49A to 49X, 66A, 55C, 56C, 57C and Form 17C) may be made so that the amendment to the Rules can be notified immediately which will enable the ECI to use the WPAT system in bye-elections in consultation with the political F parties. By placing all those materials, the ECI requested the Ministry of Law and Justice for drafting and notifying amendment Rules expeditiously. [Para 22) [575-A-D] 2. The affidavit dated 21.08.2013, filed on behalf of the ECI, shows that the Ministry of Law and Justice, on G 24.07.2013, referred the draft notification to amend the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 to provide for use of WPAT system of elections to the ECI for its views and comments. The ECI suggested certain minor modifications in the draft notification and sent the same H back to the Ministry of Law and Justice on 02.08.2013 DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY v. ELECTION 567 COMMISSION OF INDIA with a request to notify the amendment Rules at the A earliest. Accordingly, the Ministry of Law and Justice notified the amendments to the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 in the Gazette of India vide Notification No. S.O. 2470(E) dated 14.08.2013 to enable use of WPAT with EVMs. [Para 24) [575-G-H; 576-A] B 3. Though initially the ECI was little reluctant in introducing "paper trail" by use of WPAT, taking note of the advantage in the system, pursuant to the several directions to the ECI, the ECI contacted several expert bodies, technical advisors, etc. They also had various C meetings with National and State level political parties, demonstrations were conducted at various places and finally after a thorough
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex