LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

DR. P.N. DUBEY AND ORS. versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation: [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1017 · Decided: 06-02-1997 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, S. SAGHIR AHMAD · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

> 
DR. P.N. DUBEY AND ORS. 
A 
v. 
'!" 
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 
FEBRUARY 6, 1997 
[K. RAMASWAMY ANDS. SAGHIR AHMAD, JJ.) 
B 
Service Law : 
Madhya Pradesh Services (Gazetted) Recmitment Rules, 1966: 
Recmitment/Promotiorr-Post of Assistant Directors--50% direct c 
recmitment-50% promotion from Veterinary Assistant Surgeons-Govem-
ment deciding to make 100% promotions--R.ules not amende~eanwhile 
Notification issued for filling 50% of vacancies by direct recruit-
ment-Notification challenged-Held, since on the date of Notification, the 
~ 
Rules stood unamended, 50% of the vacani:ies eannarked for direct recmit-
D 
ment in accordance with Rules-No inte1fere11ce called for. 
.. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3349(N) 
of 1981. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.2.81 of the Madhya Pradesh E 
High Court in Misc. Petition No. 812 of 1980. 
Tirupurari Ray and Vineet Kumar for the Appellants. 
--r 
~ 
Sakesh Kumar and S.K. Agnihotri for the Respondents. 
F 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Madhya 
Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur Bench, made on February 10, 1981 in 
Miscellaneous Petition No. 812/80. The appellants were working as Veteri-
G 
nary Assistant Surgeons in the Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Services 
Gazetted. The Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Services is governed by the 
~ 
rules called Madhya Pradesh Services (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1966. 
The channel of recruitment to the post of Assistant Director Veterinary 
Service was from two sources, namely, direct recruitment and promotion 
in the.proportion of one is to one. An advertisement came to be made by H 
1017 
1018 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1997] 1 S.C;'R. 
A the Madhya Pradesh Public Service. Commission of 28 posts of Assistant 
< 
directors. The appellants had challenged the validity of the Notification and 
selection on the ground that the Government had, by then decided, to 
provide recruitment to the post of Assistant Directors by promotion with 
.. 
100% from the feeder cadre, namely, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon. It is 
B found, as a fact, by the High Court that as on the date of the notification, 
the rules were not amended. Unamended Rules provide that the recruit-
ment was to be made from two sources, namely, direct recruitment and by 
f-
promotion at a ratio of one is to one. Consequently, the advertisement for 
recruitment of Assistant Directors by the Public Service Commission and 
selection and appointment of the candidates were valid in law. The same 
c came to be challenged in this appeal. It is seen that undoubtedly though 
decision was taken by the Government, the Rules have not been amended. 
Therefore, the advertisement made for recruitment to fill up the posts of 
Assistant Directors, by direct recruitment and consequential selection as 
per the unamended Rules for the 50% of the vacancies earmarked for 
D direct recruitment was in accordance with the aforesaid rules. As a conse-
"\ 
quence, the view taken by the High Court is consistent with the Rules. We 
"' 
do not find any illegality warranting interference. 
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. 
G.N. 
Appeal dismissed.