LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

DR. JAYA THAKUR & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 881 · Decided: 22-03-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: SANJIV KHANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 3 S.C.R. 881 : 2024 INSC 246
Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. 
v. 
Union of India & Anr.
(Writ Petition (Civil) No. 14 of 2024)
22 March 2024
[Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Matter pertains to applications for stay of selection and appointment 
of the Election Commissioners.
Headnotes
Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners 
(Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) 
Act, 2023 – s. 7(1) – Applications for stay of selection and 
appointment of the Election Commissioners in a writ petition 
challenging vires of s. 7(1) that substituted the Chief Justice 
of India with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime 
Minister in the Selection Committee for the post of the Chief 
Election Commissioner and the ECs:
Held: Grant of stay of selection and appointment of the Election 
Commissioners would lead to chaos and virtual constitutional 
breakdown – In matters involving constitutionality of legislations, 
courts are cautious and show judicial restraint in granting interim 
orders – Unless the provision is ex facie unconstitutional or 
manifestly violates fundamental rights, the statutory provision 
cannot be stultified by granting an interim order – Stay is not 
ipso facto granted for mere examination or even when some 
cogent contention is raised – Suspension of legislation pending 
consideration is an exception and not the rule – Submission that 
this Court may by an interim order direct fresh selection with the 
CJI as a member of the Selection Committee, would be plainly 
impermissible, without declaring s. 7(1) as unconstitutional – If 
such submission is accepted, it would be enacting or writing 
a new law replacing or modifying s. 7(1), as enacted by the 
Parliament – Given the humongous task undertaken by the 
Election Commission of India, presence of two more ECs brings 
about a balance and check – Concept of plurality in Art. 324, 
882
[2024] 3 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
is necessary and desirable – Furthermore, keeping in view the 
timelines for the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok 
Sabha, it is not appropriate to pass any interim order or direction 
– Also, EC being a constitutional post, once a constitutional post 
holder is selected, they are duty bound to act in accordance 
with the letter and spirit of the Constitution – In view thereof, 
prayer for grant of stay cannot be accepted and said applications 
dismissed. [Paras 10-16]
Case Law Cited
Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India [2023] 9 SCR 1 : 
(2023) 6 SCC 161 – explained.
Health for Millions v. Union of India (2014) 14 SCC 496; 
T.N. Seshan v. Union of India [1995] Suppl. 2 SCR 
106; (1995) 4 SCC 611 – referred to.
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Chief Election Commissioner and other 
Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and 
Term of Office) Act, 2023.
List of Keywords
Election Commissioners; Stay of selection and appointment of 
the Election Commissioners; Constitutionality of legislations; 
Judicial restraint; Interim orders; Suspension of legislation pending 
consideration; Violation of Fundamental Rights; CJI as a member 
of the Selection Committee for the post of the Chief Election 
Commissioner and the ECs; Election Commission of India; Concept 
of plurality; 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha; Balance of 
convenience; Prima facie case; Irreparable injury; Stay or injunction; 
Interlocutory remedy; Constitutional post; Judicial review; Principle 
of proportionality.
Case Arising From
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No.14 of 2024
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India)
With
W.P.(C) Nos. 13, 11, 87 and 191 of 2024
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 
883
Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
Appearances for Parties
Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Vikas Singh, Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Advs., 
Prashant Bhushan, Mrs. Cheryl Dsouza, Mrs. Suroor Mander, Ms. 
Ria Yadav, Rahul Gupta, Pawan Reley, Gaurav Kumar, Vishal Sinha, 
Akshay Lodhi, Shrutanjaya Bharadwaj, Ms. Simran Singh, Sajal 
Awashti, Ms. Deepeika Kalia, Keshav Khandelwal, Ms. Vasudha 
Singh, Varun Thakur, Ramkaran, Ms. Dolly Deka, Deepak Goel, Mrs. 
Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Dr. M.K. Ravi, Denson Joseph, M/s. Varun 
Thakur & Associates, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Vishal Thakre, Gopal 
Singh, Aryan P Nanda, Aditya Yadav, Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Tota 
Ram, Sanjeev Malhotra, Ms. Ananya Kumar, Ms. Aparna Bhat, Ms. 
Karishma Maria, Advs. for the Petitioners.
Tushar Mehta, SG, Aaditya Shank

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.