DR. BALRAM SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2023] 14 S.C.R. 1083 : 2023 INSC 950 1083 CASE DETAILS DR. BALRAM SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No(s). 324 of 2020) OCTOBER 20, 2023 [S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.] HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Implementation of the provisions of Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 and the Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993. Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 β Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993 β Directions by Supreme Court β Eradication of manual scavenging in a phased manner β Rehabilitation measures β Compensation for sewer deaths etc.: Held: The Union should take appropriate measures and frame policies and issue directions, to all statutory bodies to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a phased manner, and also issue guidelines and directions that any sewer cleaning work outsourced, or required to be discharged, by or through contractors or agencies, do not require individuals to enter sewers, for any purpose whatsoever β States and Union Territories to ensure that all departments, agencies, corporations ensure that guidelines and directions framed by the Union are embodied in their own guidelines and directions β States to ensure that such directions are applicable to all municipalities, and local bodies functioning within their territories β The Union, State and Union Territories to ensure that full rehabilitation (including employment to the next of kin, education to the wards, and skill training) measures are taken in respect of sewage workers, and those who die β Compensation for sewer deaths shall be Rs.30 lakhs β Compensation stated in the case of sewer victims suο¬ ering disabilities, depending upon the severity of disabilities β Mechanism be devised to 1084 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 14 S.C.R. ensure accountability, especially wherever sewer deaths occur in the course of contractual or outsourced work β A model contract to be deviced, to be used wherever contracts are to be awarded and in the event of any mishap, the agency would lose its contract, possibly blacklisting β Modalities be drawn for the conduct of a National Survey β NALSA shall be part of the consultations, toward framing the policies as directed β The Union, State and Union Territories to ensure coordination with all the commissions like National Commission for Safai Karamcharis (NCSK), State Commission for Safai Karamcharis (NCSC) for setting up of state level, district level committees and commissions, in a time bound manner β NCSK, NCSC, National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) and the Union government to coordinate and prepare training and education modules, for information and use by district and state level agencies, under the 2013 Act β A portal and a dashboard, containing all relevant information, including the information relating to sewer deaths, victims and the status of compensation disbursement, as well as rehabilitation measures taken, and existing and available rehabilitation policies be developed and launched β Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Rules, 2013β National Commission for Safai Karamchari Act, 1993β Constitution of Indiaβ Articles 15(2), 17, 23, 24β Civil Rights Act, 1955 β Contract Labour (Prohibition and Regulation Act), 1970. [Para 96] Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 β s.11 β Interpretation of β Plea of the Union that s.11 requires localized surveys by local bodies and not a national survey: Held: 2013 Act is not a regular statute, it is emancipatory in character and is a manifestation of the constitutional code of upliftment β The groundbreaking purpose of the 2013 Act is to ensure that manual scavengers are rehabilitated β Rehabilitation is a step after identiο¬ cation β Without a survey, rehabilitation is not workable β The statutory scheme cannot be undermined through an interpretation that would leave the implementation of the 2013 Act solely with the local bodies, without any guidance from the Governments, State and Central β The Central and State Governments were and are, duty-bound to lay down the parameters under which a local body was mandated to conduct a survey β While the methodology of the Survey 1085
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex