LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

DLF HOMES PANCHKULA (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SHIV KUMAR versus SUSHILA DEVI AND ANR. ETC.

Citation: [2019] 2 S.C.R. 739 · Decided: 26-02-2019 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: UDAY UMESH LALIT · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
739
DLF HOMES PANCHKULA (P) LTD. THROUGH
ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. SHIV KUMAR
v.
SUSHILA DEVI AND ANR. ETC.
(Civil Appeal Nos. 2285-2330 of 2019)
FEBRUARY 26, 2019
[UDAY UMESH LALIT AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.]
Consumer Protection Act, 1986:
Complaint of deficiency in service – Against the developer of
property – Alleging delayed delivery of possession of apartments –
Some of the complainants sought refund of all the money they had
paid while others sought compensation for delayed delivery with
possession of the apartment – State Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission allowing the complaints directed refund of deposited
amounts with interest @ 15% p.a. and with lesser rate in others and
compensation – Similar directions were passed in cases of delayed
delivery of possession – Appeal filed before National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission by the Developer – The Developer
however objected that the appeals could not be proceeded with as
there was not even one Judicial Member on the Bench – National
Commission reserved the matters for orders by its order dated
1.8.2018 – Review petition filed by the Developer was rejected by
order dated 8.8.2018 – In petition u/Art.227 of the Constitution
against the orders dated 1.8.2018 and 8.8.2018, High Court stayed
the operation of the order of the National Commission – Thereafter,
National Commission passed reasoned judgment on 7.9.2018
affirming the order of State Commission – However, in view of the
stay order of the High Court, it observed that judgment dated
7.9.2018 would remain stayed till further orders by High Court –
Present appeals by the Developers as well as some of the
complainants – Held: All the parties agreed for disposal of the cases
in terms of understanding as per the governing principles set out –
Matter disposed of on the agreed understanding as settled by the
parties.
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 739
739
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
740                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS            [2019] 2 S.C.R.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal
Nos. 2285-2330 of 2019.
From the Judgment and Order dated 07.09.2017 of the  National
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal
Nos. 382, 447, 879, 881, 648, 649, 650, 651, 982, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1315,
767, 1158, 1347, 1348, 1349, 1351, 1352, 1576, 1577, 1579, 1580, 1581,
1582, 1583, 1584, 1586, 1587, 1589, 1590, 1591, 1592, 1593, 1594, 1595,
1598, 1601, 1623, 1578, 1599, 1600, 1622, 1625 of 2016, 1643, 453 and
638 of 2017.
WITH
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.931, 939 and 968 of 2019,
Civil Appeal No.2354 of 2019.
Pinaki Misra, Sr. Adv., Amarjeet Singh, Narender Yadav, R. N.
Karanjawala, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Deepti Sarin, Nakul Gandhi,
Sahil Monga, Ms. Manik Karanjawala, Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Ms. Seema
Sundd, Pravin Bahadur, Saurabh Kumar, Prabhat Ranjan,  Aditya Singh,
Ms. Swikriti Singhania, Alabhay D., Ms. Shreyansi Goel, Kartik Nayar,
M/s. Karanjawala & Co., Ranbir Singh Yadav, Puran Mal Saini,
Ms. Anzu K. Verkey,  Pati Raj Yadav, B. Rajesh, Ankur Bansal, Anuj
Arora, Dr. M. K. Ravi, Ms. Aruna Tilekar, Ms. Priya Puri, Ms. Vineeta
Meghrajani, Anand S. Jha, Md. Ali, Ankit Gupta, Akash Vashisth,  Ranvijay
Singh, Siddharth Mittal, Hari Om Yaduvanshi, Dr. Monika Gusain, Sandeep
Chhabra, Jinendra Jain, Dinesh Chander Trehan, Ms. Astha Tyagi, Rajesh
Kumar Chaurasia, Sudhir Kathapalia, Anant Agarwal, Ms. Sweta Rani,
Siddharth Batra, Nikhlesh, Naveen Sheokand, Ashok Kashyap, Vishwa
Pal Singh, Nikilesh Ramachandran, Advs. for the appearing parties.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Leave granted in all matters,
except Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.931 of 2019, 939 of 2019 and
968 of 2019.
Re:  Appeals arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.928-976
of 20191 (DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. Through its Authorised
Signatory Mr. Shiv Kumar v. Sushila Devi and another2
2. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order
dated 07.09.2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as β€˜the National
Commission’) in First Appeal Nos.382/2016, 447/2016, 453/2017,
1[Except Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.931 of 2019, 939 of 2019 and 968 of 2019]
2(Appeals by the Developer)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
741
648/2016, 649/2016, 650/2016, 651/2016, 767/2016, 879/2016, 881/2016,
1145/2016, 1146/2016, 1147/2016, 1158/2016, 1315/2016, 1347/2016, 1348/
2016, 1349/2016, 1351/2016, 1352/2016, 1576/2016, 1577/2016, 157

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.