DIVYA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2023] 15 S.C.R. 44 : 2023 INSC 900 44 CASE DETAILS DIVYA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 724 of 2023) OCTOBER 09, 2023 [J. K. MAHESHWARI AND K. V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.] HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: What is the eligibility criterion for a candidate to stake a valid claim under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Category as per the Civil Services Examination Rules, 2022 r/w OM dtd.19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019; was the UPSC justifi ed in prescribing the cut-off date for possession and for uploading of the I&AC certifi cates in the prescribed format to stake a valid claim under the EWS category; are the CSE-Rules 2022 enforceable in law; are rr. 13, 27(3) and 28 of the CSE-Rules 2022 constitutionally valid; was the UPSC justifi ed in rejecting the claim of the petitioners for consideration under the EWS category? Civil Services Examination Rules, 2022 – rr.13, 27, 28 – Prescriptions as to eligibility for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category candidates – Non-fulfi llment of – As per Offi ce Memoranda dtd. 19.01.2019 & 31.01.2019 r/w rr.27, 28, CSE-2022 Rules, for claiming reservation under EWS category, the Income & Asset Certifi cate (I&AC) must be as per the prescribed norms and in possession of the candidate on or before the cut-off date – Petitioners did not possess the valid documentation determining their eligibility before the prescribed cut-off date, were denied the benefi t of reservation of the EWS category by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for the 2022 Civil Services Examination – Propriety: Held: Candidates claiming benefi t of EWS Category for the purpose of CSE-2022, acquired eligibility only if they met the criterion prescribed in the O.M. dtd.19.01.19 and 31.01.19 and were in possession of the required I&AC, based on the income for the year 2020-21 – Further, as required u/r.28 45 r/w the aforesaid O.Ms, the candidate should have been in possession of the I&AC as on 22.02.2022 – Any candidate not in possession of the I&AC in the prescribed format could not claim the benefi t of EWS Category – Equally, as required u/r.13 at the stage of Detailed Application Form–I (DAF-I), the document in possession as on 22.02.2022 in the prescribed format, had to be submitted online before the prescribed date – UPSC strictly acted in accordance with the mandate of r.13 r/w/ rr.27 & 28 – They had an obligation to scrutinize the forms as uploaded with DAF-I – rr.13, 27 & 28 are to be r/w the Offi ce Memoranda of 19.01.2019 & 31.01.2019 especially clause 5 of the Offi ce Memorandum of 31.01.2019 – UPSC justifi ed in rejecting the candidature of the candidates who submitted their I&AC beyond the stipulated deadline and rejecting their claim for consideration under the EWS Category in CSE-2022 – Case of the Petitioners in Writ Petition (C) Nos.705 and 764 fails additionally, for being directly covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union Public Service Commission vs. Gaurav Singh & Ors. in C.A. No.4152 of 2022. [Paras 74, 86 (i)] Civil Services Examination Rules, 2022 – Benefi ts under the EWS Category – Cut-off date for eligibility prescribed – Justifi cation: Held: The UPSC was justifi ed in prescribing the cut-off date for possession and for uploading of the I&AC in the prescribed format for claimants claiming benefi ts under the EWS Category – This fl ows from the O.M. dtd. 19.01.2019 & 31.01.2019 r/w rr.13, 27(3) and 28 of the CSE-Rules, 2022 and the long line of judgments in which principles for prescription of cut-off for eligibility are laid down – Service Law. [Para 86 (ii)] Civil Services Examination Rules, 2022 – Validity: Held: The CSE-2022 Rules have the force of an enforceable law – They are traceable to the All India Services Act, 1951 r/w the Indian Administrative Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 r/w the Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Competitive Examination) Regulations, 1955 and all this r/w Article 73 of the Constitution of India – The CSE Rules do not in any manner supplant any of the provisions of the All India Service Act or the IAS Recruitment Rules or the IAS (Appointment by Competitive Examination) Regulations – They only supplement them – While the manner of conduct of examinations is clearly traceable to Regulation 3, it is untenable to say that since Regulation 4 in the conditions of eligibility does not prescribe DIVYA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 46 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 15 S.C.R. EWS category a
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex