LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

DAMMU SREENU versus STATE OF A.P.

Citation: [2009] 9 S.C.R. 858 · Decided: 28-05-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

I 
[2009] 9 S.C.R. 858 
:. 
.. 
A 
DAMMU SREENU 
v. 
STATE OF A.P. 
(Criminal Appeal No.681 of 2003) 
B 
MAY 28, 2009 
[DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND DR. B.S. 
CHAUHAN, JJ.] 
PENAL CODE, 1860: 
c 
Section 306 - Abetment to commit suicide - Wife of 
deceased had illicit relationship with accused No. 1 -
Deceased felt humiliated and insulted - Charge sheet against 
the wife and her paramour - Convicted and sentenced to five 
D years rigorous imprisonment - On appeal, sentence reduced 
to three years simple imprisonment - In revision wife's 
sentence reduced to one year which she had already 
undergone - On appeal by the other accused, Held: There 
is definitely a proximity and nexus between the conduct and 
E behaviour of accused with the suicide committed by the 
deceased - Also there is clear and unambiguous findings of 
fact of three courts that the appellant is guilty of offence under 
s. 306 /PC - Such findings do not call for any interference -
Order of High Court convicting and sentencing the accused 
'f 
;;i 
F 
upheld - Accused to surrender to serve out the remaining 
period of the sentence. 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal 
No. 681 of 2003. 
G 
From the Judgment & Order dated 05.02.2003 of the High 
..._ 
Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, in Criminal Revision 
-ยท 
Case No. 862 of 2000. 
A.T. Rao and A. Subba Rao for the Appellants. ยท 
H 
858 
,,( 
DAMMU SREENU v. STATE OF A.P. 
859 
.. 
D. Ramakrishna Reddy and D. Bharathi Reddy for the A 
Respondents. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J. 1. The appellant 
B 
herein filed the present appeal seeking for his acquittal from 
the order of conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal 
Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the IPC') whereby he was 
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. 
2. The appellant herein allegedly had illicit relationship with c 
the wife of the deceased Sitra Nagarjuna Rao. The wife of the 
< ' 
deceased was also made a co-accused in the same offence 
under Section 306 IPC and she was convicted for the aforesaid 
offence and was sentenced initially to undergo rigorous 
imprisonment for a period of three years which, however, later D 
on was altered to one year of rigorous imprisonment by the High 
Court of Andhra Pradesh. The said sentence of one year _has 
been served out by Accused No. 2, the wife of the deceased 
Sitra Nagarjuna Rao. 
3. The prosecution has alleged in its case that the present E 
appellant had developed an illicit intimacy with Accused No. 2, 
who was the wife of the deceased Sitra Nagarjuna Rao. On the 
~ 
'y 
night of 31.12.1995, accused No. 2, the wife of the deceased 
went out of her house and returned to her matrimonial home -
only on the next day. The deceased, Sitra Nagarjuna Rao was F 
' 
unhappy with the aforesaid conduct and so, naturally 
, 
questioned her about her behaviour because of which there 
was a quarrel between the two. Being disturbed and perturbed 
on account of the behaviour of his wife (Accused No. 2), the 
,deceased, Sitra Nagarjuna Rao called the father of Accused G 
.. 
No. 2 and asked him to take her away so as to give her proper 
~~ 
counseling. Accordingly, she was taken away by her father. On 
the same day the present appellant (Accused No. 1) came to 
the house of the deceased and when he was questioned by 
the inmates of the house of the deceased, he stated that he H 
860 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2009] 9 S.C.R. 
;.
A had illicit relations with the wife of the deceased and that he 
would keep coming to the house of the deceased so long she 
does not object to the same. When he was told that Accused 
No. 2 had gone with her father, Accused No. 1 went to the house 
of the brother of Accused No. 2 and took her away despite the 
B protest of PW-5, brother of AccusEd No. 2, in whose house his 
father kept her. The appellant took tier away and brought her 
back to the house of her brother only after 4 days and to her 
parents' house on 06.01.1996. 
c 
4. Having come to know about the aforesaid incident, the 
deceased felt humiliated and insulted. He committed suicide 
by hanging himself in the intervening night of 7th and 8th 
January, 1996. It is.also to be noted, at this stage, that prior to 
,, .
his suicide, the deceased, Sitra Nagarjuna Rao expressed 
t 
~
before his brother that it would be better to die as he felt very 
D much insulted and humiliated. The deceased having committed 
suicide, his brother gave a report 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.