DAMJI V ALJI SHAH AND ANOTHER versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A DAMJI V ALJI SHAH AND ANOTHER V. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. B April 8, 1965. D E F .B [P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C. J., M. HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL AND V." RAMASWAMI. JJ.J Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, ss. 15 .and 44(a)-Indian Companies Act, 1956, ss. 446(1 )-Application by Life Insurance Cor- poration under s. 15 of L.I.C. Act-Defendant company ordered to be wound.up by court--..:Permission of High Court under s. 446(1). of Companies Act whether necessary for proceeding with application under s. 15. Indian Insurance Act, 1938 s. )(}-Transfer of Funds from Life Insurance Fund to General Department of composiite 1nsurer-Per- 1nissibility. The appellants were directors of an insurance company which was a composite insurer i.e. Qne carrying on other classes of ~1fe insurance business besides life insurance. Under s. 10(1) of the Indian Life Insurance Act, 1938, a composite insurer had to keep sepa~ate accounts in respect of the different classes of business, and its receipts in respect of life insurance business had to &:o into a fund called the Life Insurance Fund which could be appl!ed only for the pur- poses of the Life Insurance business and had always. to be sufficient to meet the net .liabilities of the Life Insurance busmess. By resolu- tion dated December 18, 1948, a sum of Rs. 1,10,000 was transferred from the General Department of the company to the Life Depart- ment to be added to the Life Fund; if this had not been done the said fund would have shown a deficit in the actuarial valuation report dated July' 18, 1949. In the profit appropriation account of the company for the latter year a sum of Rs. 60,000 out of the above sum was written off so that the sum advanced was reduced to Rs. 50,000. A further sum of Rs. 32,000 was again similarly transfer- red from the General to the Life Department by resolution passed in August 1953 with retrospective effect from December 31, 1952, in order to strengthen the position of the Life Fund which again would have shown a deficit if this had not been done. The advances thus made on both occasions were according to the relevant resolu- tions repayable only out of the 'valuation surplus', if any, in the life department. On January 8, 1956, the Board of Directors of the company transferred a sum of Rs. 82,000 from the Life Department to the General Department. by way of repayment of the above loans. On January 19, 1956, by Ordinance No. 1 of 1956 the management of the life insurance business of all insurers in the country passed to the Central Government. On September 1, 1956, the Life Insur- ance Corporation of India came into being under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, and the assets and liabilities of the life insur- ance business carried on by all insurers became ·.,rested in it. The corporation filed an application under s. 15 of the said Act before the Tribunal constitµted under the Act allegin!i' that transfer of Rs. 82,000 from the Life Department to the General Department of the aforesaid company was without consideration and not for any 665 SUPREME COURT REPORT8 [!96fi] 3 s.c.R. necessity of the life insurance business and prayed for a decree A against appellants and the company jointly and severally for the said amount. The Tribunal overruled the defendants' objections as to its jurisdiction and granted a decree to the Corporation as prayed. The company did not appeal but the appellants came to this Court by special leave. The following COI\tentions were raised on behalf of the appel- B !ants; (1) The tribunal had no jurisdiction to proceed with the pro- ceedings on the petition presented by the Corporation without the leave of the High Court in .view of s. 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Company having been ordered to be wound up the High Court on November 9, 1959; (2) In view of s. 44(a) of the L.I.C. Act noi..; of the provisions of the Act applied to the company and therefore the Tribunal could not proceed on the application of the CorPora- C tion subsequent to the company being: wound-up; (3) The transfer of Rs. 82,000 from the Life Fund to the General Department of the company was for corisic\eration and was necessary for the life insur- ance business. HELD: (i) The provisions of s. 446 of the Companie.> Act did not affect the proceedings before the Tribunal. It is in view of the exclusive jurisdiction conferred upon the company court in sub-s. (2) of
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex