LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

DAKSHABEN B. PATEL versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF DAMAN AND DIU AND 4 ORS.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 436 · Decided: 10-11-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
DAKSHABEN B. PATEL 
v. 
THE ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF DAMAN AND DIU AND 4 ORS. 
NOVEMBER 10, 1995 
B 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
Se1vice Law: 
Regulmisation-Tlibunal extending time for obtaining M. Phil De-
C gree-Employee obtaining the degree within the extended time-Case to be 
refen-ed to UPSC for regulmisation-Directions issued. 
This appeal is against the Tribunal's order dated January 13, 1992 
extending six months' time to obtain the M. Phil Degree. 
D 
Allowing the appeal, this Court 
HELD : The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the 
appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the 
candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. 
Phil in Economics. Respondents are directed to refer the case of the 
E ยท appellant for regularisation to the UPSC which would be done according 
to rules. [437-A-B] 
F 
G 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 10539 of 
1995. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.6.95 of the Central Ad-
ministrative Tribunal, Bombay in Misc. P. No. 1269/94 in O.A. No. 1177 of 
1993. 
K. Madhava Reddy and P.D. Sharma for the Appellant. 
K. Lahiri, B.K. Prasad, Niranjana Singh, S.N. Tardol, Ms. Sushma 
Suri and C.S. Babu for the Respondent No. 1 for UPSC. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
H 
Leave granted. 
436 
D.B.PATELv. U.T.OFDAMANANDDIU 
437 
The Tribunal, vide order dated January 13, 1992 with the consent of A 
the counsel for the respondents, had extended six months' time to obtain 
the M. Phil Degree. The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that 
the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the 
candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of 
M. Phil in Economics. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed 
and O.A. stands disposed of. 
Respondents are directed to refer the case of the appellant for 
regularisation to the UPSC which would be done according to rules. 
G.N. 
Appeal allowed. 
B