LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

D.K. MITRA AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: [1985] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 818 · Decided: 01-07-1985 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, R.S. PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHERJI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
818 
D.K. MITRA AND ORS. 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 
July I, 1985 
[Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, C.J., R.S. PATHAK AND SABYASACHI 
MUKHARJI, JJ.] 
Indian Railway Medical Service (District Medical Officers) Recruitmenl 
Rules 1965/lndlan Railway Medical Service (District Medical Officers) Recruit-
ment Rules 1973/lndian Railway Medical Service (Dirisional Medical Officers/ 
Senior Medical Officers) Recruitment Rules 1975/lndian Railway Medical Ser11i{e 
(Chief Medical 
Officers, Additional 
Chief 
Medical 
Officers, 
Med/cal 
Superintendents and Divisional/Senior Medical Officers) Recruitment R11/es 
1978-lndian Railway Medical Service-Combined seniority list of Divisional 
Medical Officers-Promotees and direct recruits-Promotion to post of Medical 
Superintendent-Validity of-Pron1otion-Principle of''non~selection''-~Yhether 
equivalent to "seniority-cu1n-suitabili1y"-Non-classijication of posts into perma-
nent and tenrporary- Whether all posts to be regarded as pern:anent-Person& 
appointed substantfrely whetlrcr could be senior to persons appvinted in officiating 
capactiy-Persons appointed to the higher post on the basis of ·'selection'-
1¥hetlter could be junior to the persons appointed subsequently-Zone wise confir-
nration-Whethe:· permissible in case of an All India Service-Detern1inalion of 
seniority-Confirmation date whether relevant-Criteria for fixing inter-se 
se11iority between promotees a.-1d direct recruits-What is- Quota for direct recruit-
ment-Not maintained for long period-Whether there could be rotation of 
posts. 
The Indian Railways Medical Service consists of Assistant Divisional 
Medical Officers Class I (before January 1, 1973 described as Assistant Medical 
Officers Class II). Divisional Medical Officers, Medical Superintendents, Chief 
Medical Officers and Director General of Medical Services. 
The Petitioners in the writ petition who were Assistant Medical Officers 
Class II were confirmed, one in 1962 and the others in 1963. During the years 
1970 to 72 they were selected by Departmental Promotion Committees for 
officiating appointments to the Class I post of Divisional Medical Officers. At 
that time the Indian Railway Medical Service (District Medical 
Officers) 
H 
Recruitment Rules 1965 were applicable. Those Rules were repealed and 
replaced by the Indian Railway Medical Service (District Medical Officers) 
Recruitmeat Rules JQ73. 
Under the Rules of 1965 and the Rules 1973 the 
pQ~ts of Di~tri~t ?vfe4ical Offlcers w¢re treated a$ selection post3. 
• 
D.K. MITRA V. UNION 
819 
The existing pay scale of Rs. 350-900 attached to the post of Assistant 
Medical Officer was revised by the Third Pay Commission and split into two 
pay scales, a higher Class I scale of Rs. 700-1600 and a lower Class II scale of 
Rs. 650-1200 and the posts of Assistant Medical Officers were divided into those 
carrying the higher pay scale and those 
carrying the lower pay scale. 
The upgraded 
posts in the 
higher 
pay scale of Rs. 700-1600 were 
designated as 
"Assistant Divisional 
Medical Officers". The petitioners 
were plactd 
in 
the 
higher 
pay 
scale 
of Rs. 
700-1600 and were 
d~signated as Assistant Divisional Medical Officers with effect from January 
1, 1973. 
The Rules of 1973 were replaced by the Indian Railway Medical 
Service (Divisional Medical Officers/Senior Medical Officers) Recruitment Rules 
1975, which were further-replaced by the Indian Railway Medical Service (Chief 
Medical Officers. Additional Chief Medical Officers, Medical Superintendents 
and Divisional Senior Medical Officers) Recruitment Rules, 1978. Under these 
Rules promotion is effected on the principle of ''non-selection", that is, on 
"seniority-cum-suitability'' basis. 
The Rules of 1965 showed that there were 101 posts in the grade of 
Divisional Medical Officers. The Rules of 1973 mentioned 109 posts and refer-
red to them as permanent posts only. 
The Railway 
Ministry for the 
promotion of Assistant Medical Officers to the Class I posts of Divisional 
Medical Officers indicated the number of existing vacancies for the purpose of 
permanent promotion and the number of anticipated vacancies for the purpose 
of officiating appointments, the number under each category being specified 
zone-wise. A Class I Departmental Promotion Committee met on several 
occasions and considered the cases of candidates who had completed five yean 
and abov~ of service as A<>sistant Medical Officers for substantive promotion

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.