COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION versus SHRI PRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHA BOARDING HOUSE’S COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 464 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 15 S.C.R. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION v. SHRI PRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHA BOARDING HOUSE’S COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 364 of 2005) NOVEMBER 08, 2019 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, DEEPAK GUPTA AND ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.] Education/Educational Institutions – Architectural course – Institutions running said course – Norms and standards for – Issue as to the final authority in case of any contradiction in the opinion of Council of Architecture (CoA) [constituted under the 1972 Act] and All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) [constituted under the 1987 Act], in the matters of grant of approval to institutions for conducting the said course and monitoring their working – Seven matters involving similar controversy – In main appeal C.A. No.364 of 2005, the dispute pertains to intake capacity of the respondent-institution – CoA on carrying out inspection of the institution in 2004 restored the intake capacity of 40 students per year which was earlier reduced to 30 – However, the Director of Technical Education fixed the same at 30 students on the basis of norms fixed by AICTE – Challenged – High Court inter alia upheld the power of CoA as the final authority for fixing the norms and standards of institutions running course on architecture – On appeal, held: So far as recognition of degrees and diplomas of architecture education is concerned, the 1972 Act shall prevail – AICTE not entitled to impose any regulatory measure in connection with the degrees and diplomas in the subject of architecture – Judgment of the Bombay High Court sustained in the main appeal – In civil appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.5400 of 2011, the process of recognition contained in the 1972 Act be implemented in respect of the subject institution before any further admission takes place – But, admissions already undertaken in terms of interim orders of Supreme Court, not to be disturbed – It is so directed, as the High Court itself directed compliance of CoA norms and building requirements set by it was to be effected within one year – AICTE not to have any regulatory control over the concerned institution so far as architecture education is concerned [2019] 15 S.C.R. 464 464 A B C D E F G H 465 – Appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.8443 of 2011 is dismissed – Further, in the appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.20460 of 2011, decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court issuing directions contained in the judgment under appeal in absence of CoA being impleaded is erroneous – However, no independent directions issued as these appeals were heard together as batch matters and the grievances of CoA have been addressed in the judgment – Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos.17005 and 17006 of 2016 are disposed of in terms of the decision in the main appeal – In appeal arising out of SLP(C)No.28121 of 2018, the decision of the Kerala High Court is set aside – Institution involved is entitled to operate with recognition obtained under the 1972 Act – Interim orders passed in these appeals, dissolved – Architects Act, 1972 – ss.2(d), 3, 14-21, 25, 35, 43-45 – All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 – ss. 2(g), 3, 10, 11, 22, 23, 25– All India Council for Technical Education (Grant of approval for starting new technical institutions, introduction of courses or programmes and approval of intake capacity of seats for the courses or programmes) Regulations, 1994 – All India Council for Technical Education (Norms and Guidelines for Fees and guidelines for admission in Professional Colleges) Regulations, 1994 – Council of Architecture Regulations, 1982 – Part VIII- Clauses 29, 30 – Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations 1983 – Clauses 5, 8; Appendix B, C – Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulation, 2015 – Constitution of India – Art.77 – Interpretation of Statutes. Interpretation of Statutes – Former and later Acts – Clashing provisions – Overlapping provisions in the 1972 Act (under which the Council of Architecture (CoA) is constituted) and the 1987 Act (under which the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) is constituted) on the question of grant of approval and subsequent monitoring of architectural education – Plea on behalf of AICTE that the 1987 Act being later statute, covering common field, the provisions of the 1972 Act, to the extent the same deals with architectural education, shall be deemed to have been repealed by implication
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex