COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, GIAN PRAKASH, NEW DELHI & ANR. versus K.S. JAGANNATHAN & ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
<XMP'l'ROU.Ell AND AUDITOR. GENERAL OF INDIA, GIAN PlWCASB, NEW IJELIII & ANR. v. K.S. JAGANRATHAN & ARL APRIL 1 , 1986 [R.S. PATHAK, A.P. SEN AND D.P. MADON, JJ.] 17 A B ...,:. Constitution of India : - " -~ ~ Article 226 - Powers of Court - Writ of MandaDUs - Issuance of - To direct Government/public authority to c exercise its discretion in a particular manner. Articles 16( 4), 46 and 335 - Qualifying examinations for promotion - Relaxation of standards in the case of Scheduled Caste/Tribe candidates - Validity/permissibility of ~ Whether to be consistent with efficiency of service. D -~ The Comptroller and Auditor General's Manual of Standing Orders (Adudnistrative), Volume I, Chapter V, paras 195, 197, 198, 199 & 207 - Subordinate Accounts Service Examinations (Ordinary) - Relaxation of standard for Scheduled Caste/Tribe candidates - Whether violates Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum dated January 21, 1977 -Relaxation- Determination Β·~Β· of in advance - Notification before the examination - Necessity of. ~ Statutory interpretation - Welfare Legislation Necessity for being construed in the light of constitutional provisions guaranteeing protection. Practice and Procedure - Passing of orders and giving directions to compel performance in a proper and lawful manner of discretion conferred upon Government/public authority - -4-<' Co~etency of High Court. Civil Services - Members of Scheduled Castes/Tribes - Relaxation of standards in qualifying examinations for prOtootion - Determination in advance - Notification before examination - Necessity for. E F G H A B c D E F G H 18 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1986] 2 S.C.R. ~- Office Memorandum No. 36021/10/76-Estt. (SCT) datedΒ· January 21, 1977 issued by the Department of Personnel and β’ Administrative Reforms to all Ministeries and Departments, required that if a sufficient number of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates were not available in the qualifying examinations on the basis of the general standard, to fill all the vacancies reserved for them in the promotional posts suitable relaxation in the qualifying standard be made }. in their case, bearing in mind ( 1) the number of vacancies reserved, (2) the performance of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates as well as the general candidates ~ in that examination, (3) the miniDI.liD standard of fitness for. - appointment to the post, and also (4) the overall strength o[._ the cadre and that of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in that cadre, the extent of relaxation to be deter- A mined on each occasion having regard to the relevant factors. ~ The respondents, who belong to the Scheduled Castes, were working as Selection Grade Auditors in the Department of Indian Audit and Accounts, appeared for Part II Subordinate Accounts Service (S.A.S.) Examdnation (Ordinary) in December, ~' 1980 for the next promtional post of Section Officer. The total aggregate of all the papers was 500 marks. Candidates ~Β were required to obtain the minimum of 40 per cent .marks in the individual subject and 45 per cent in the aggregate. The first respondent secured 213 marks (42.6%) and the second 204 ~ marks (40.8%), but failed to reach the aggregate requirement of 225 marks. The Department gave a general relaxation of 5 '"f grace marks in the aggregate, inclusive of 5 marks in one or mre subjects, to all the candidates. As against that the llf Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates were given 8~ grace marks in the aggregate inclusive of 5 grace marks in onl~ or more subjects, which could be of no avail to the respondents. The respondents filed a petition under Art. 226 for a direction to the appellants to make suitable relaxation in the qualifying standard of marks for Part II of the S.A. S. t Examination held in December 1980 in terms of the aforesaid 'r Office Meoorandum and to declare them as having passed the said exam! nat ion. - COMPTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL v. JAGANNATHAN 19 That writ petition was dismissed but the writ appeal was allowed by a Division Bench holding that the authorities concerned had not applied their mind to the actual state of affairs that existed, in fixing the relaxation which negatived the benefit that lawfully would have gone to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates, and directed the appellants to grant suitable relaxation to the
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex