LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI versus LIFELONG APPLIANCES LTD.

Citation: [2006] 2 S.C.R. 1157 · Decided: 09-03-2006 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: AR. LAKSHMANAN, DALVEER BHANDARI

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI 
A 
v. 
LIFELONG APPLIANCES LTD. 
MARCH 9, 2006 
[DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN AND DALVEER BHANDARI, JJ.] 
B 
Central Excise Rules, 1944: 
s.57-CC-Manufacturer satisfYing requirement of not taking MOD VAT 
credit on inputs used in manufacturer of goods-Held, case covered by r.57- C 
CC as well as Chandrapur Magnet Wires' case*. 
*Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, 
Nagpur (1996) 81 ELT 3 SC, relied on. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 5660 of 2000. D 
From the Final Order No. 626/00-8 dated 26.4.2000 of the CEGAT, 
New Delhi in Appeal No. E-317 of 99-8. 
Harish Chandra, Ms. Shalini Kumar and P. Parmeswaran for the 
Appellant. 
Alok Yadav and M.P. Devanath for the Respondent. 
The Order of the Court was delivered by 
E 
Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned 
counsel for the respondent. We have perused the order impugned in this 
appeal. The Tribunal as a matter of fact held that the appellant has satisfied F 
the requirement of not taking Modvat credit on the inputs used in the 
manufacture of exempted goods and therefore their case is specifically covered 
by Rule 57-CC as well as the decision in Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) ltd. 
v. Collector of C. Excise, Nagpur, reported in (1996) 81 ELT 3 SC with 
regard to not availing Modvat credit on inputs. The impugned order, therefore, G 
is not liable to be interfered with at the instance of the Revenue. The appeal 
fails and stands dismissed. No costs. 
'R.P. 
Appeal dismissed. 
1157