LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. versus VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED

Citation: [2011] 4 S.C.R. 803 · Decided: 11-04-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

• 
[2011] 4 S.C.R. 803 
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. 
v. 
VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED 
(Civil Appeal No. 3186 of 2011) 
APRIL 11, 2011 
[DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND 
ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.] 
. 
A 
B 
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948: s.4-A(4) - Fixed 
capital investment -
Bottles and crates used by the C 
respondent in its factory for the manufacture of soft drinks and 
beverages - Inclusion of value of bottles and crates in the 
i'ixed capital investment ::... Held: Bottles are essential part of 
components and equipments necessary for the running of the 
factory of the respondent and; therefore, its value would form 
D 
part of the fixed capital investment and would be entitled to 
exemption -
Crates are used only for the purpose of 
marketing and their use is necessary only for taking out the 
bottled beverages out of the factory - Crates having no user 
so far as running of the factory of the respondent is E 
concerned, therefore, value of crates cannot be deemed to 
be investment for the purpose of including it within the 
meaning of expression "Fixed Capital Investment" as per sub-
section (4) of s. 4-A of the Act. 
The question which arose for consideration in the 
Instant appeal was whether the bottles and crates used 
by the respondent in its factory for the manufacture of 
soft drinks and beverages were to be treated as part of 
"Fixed Capital Investment" as being essential apparatus 
F 
for the manufacture of soft drinks and, therefore, covered 
G 
within the meaning of sub-section (4) of Section 4-A of 
the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act. 
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court 
803 
H 
804 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2011) 4 S.C.R. 
A 
HELD: 1.1. Section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act which 
lays down that where the State Government is of the 
opinion that it is necessary so ~ do for increasing the 
production of any goods or for promoting the 
development of any industry in the State, it may on the 
B application or otherwise declare that the turnover of sales 
in respect of_ such goods by the manufacturer thereof 
shall, during such period not exceeding fifteen years is 
exempted from payment of trade tax provide~ that goods 
manufactured in the new unit has a fixed capital 
c investment of five crore rupees or more. The said section 
further provided in sub-section (4) of Section 4-A of the 
Act as to what is the meaning of the expression "Fixed 
Capital Investment". It is provided therein that "Fixed 
capital investment" means value of land and building and 
0 such plants including captive power plant, machinery, 
equipment, apparatus, components, moulds, dyes, jigs 
and.fixtures. Sub-clause (b) inserted in the proviso to sub-
section (4) of Section 4-A of the Act stated that for the 
purposes of determining value of plant including captive 
power plant, machinery, equipment, apparatus, 
E components, moulds, dyes, jigs and fixtures only 
investment, whether by means of purchases, hire or 
lease in such plant, equipment, apparatus, components 
and machinery, as is necessary for the establishment or 
running of the factory or workshop shall be taken into 
F account. The object of the relevant provision in the light 
of other provisions of the Act, made it crystal clear that 
the value of investment for equipments, apparatus and 
components for running the factory and workshop has 
also to be considered as investment and such value is 
G required to be included within the ambit of fixed capital 
investment. [Paras 12, 17] [809-E-F; 810-A-B; 812-G-H] 
H 
CST v. Industrial Coal Enterprises (1999) 2 SCC 607 -
relied on. 
• COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. v. VARUN 
805 
BEVERAGES LTD. 
State of Bihar and Others v. Steel City Beverage Limited 
A 
and another (1999) 1 sec 10- referred to. 
1.2. Considering the wording of the provision itself, 
it is quite necessary to give full and complete effect to the 
provision in a purposive manner so as to advance the 
8 
objective of the provision. The respondents were 
engaged in the manufacture of soft drink and beverages 
which were required to be bottled and thereafter sealed, 
which were essential part of running of the factory and, 
therefore, the same would have to be included within the 
C 
said extended meaning of the word 'investment' as 
appearing from the words 'fixed capital investment'. In the 
facts and circumstances, so far bottles are concerned, 
they are essential part of ·components and equipments 
necessary for the running of the factory and, therefore, 
such valu

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.