LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI versus M/S BILAHARI INVESTMENT (P) LTD.

Citation: [2008] 3 S.C.R. 477 · Decided: 27-02-2008 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.H. KAPADIA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2008] 3 S.C.R. 477 
" -
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI 
A 
\/. 
M/S BILAHARI INVESTMENT (P) LTD. 
(Civil Appeal No. 1625 of 2008) 
FEBRUARY 27, 2008 
B 
... 
J: 
(S.H. KAPADIA AND B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, JJ.) 
Income Tax Act, 1961: 
Chit Fund Scheme -
Income - Assessment of -
Accounting of chit discount - Completed Contract Method of c 
accounting or Deferred Revenue Expenditure Method - Claim 
for chit discount - Held: Income accrued under the chit fund -
scheme could be identified by following several methods of 
accounting including Completed Contract Method or Deferred 
Revenue Expenditure Method - Completed Contract Method D 
": 
leads to objective assessment of income - No finding recorded 
by the Courts below to the effect that the Completed Contract 
Method distorts the profits/income - Even calculation of 
income from the Deferred Revenue Expenditure Method 
brings the same result - In past, . Revenue had accepted the E 
Completed Contract Method of accounting for the purpose of 
allowability of chit discount -Hence, no interference with the 
judgment of High Court allowing Completed Contract Method 
,-k 
of accounting for calculating income called for. 
• 
Income Tax Act, 1961; S. 211(2): 
F 
Accounting Standards (AS) - Substitution of Deferred 
Revenue Expenditure Method in place of Completed Contract 
Method of accounting in terms of AS 22 - Held: Not allowed 
since Revenue did not invoke AS 22 in the instant appeals. 
G 
Words and Phrases: 
;i. 
'Completed Contract Method' and 'Deferred Revenue 
Expenditure Method of accounting - Distinction between in 
477 
H 
478 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2008] 3 S.C.R. 
A the context of calculation of income from chit fund scheme. 
Assessee companies, subscribing to chit fund 
scheme as their business activities, were maintaining their 
accounts on mercantile basis by computing profit/loss at 
the end of the chit period following the Completed 
B Contract Method of accounting. The said method of 
accounting was earlier accepted by the Revenue for 
several years. Assessing Authority held that the 
Completed Contract Method was not an accurate method 
to identify "income" under the provisions of the Income 
C Tax Act, and in the context of the "chit discount", the 
Deferred 
Revenue 
Expenditure 
calculated 
on 
proportionate basis was the correct method and 
accordingly rejected the Completed Contract Method of 
accounting as adopted by the assessees. The view of the 
D Assessing Authority has been affirmed by the Tribunal and 
the High Court. However, in the matter of chit discount, 
overruling the order of the Tribunal, the High Court has 
held that the completed contract method of accounting 
adopted by the assessees was valid and that the Revenue 
E had erred in spreading the discount over the remaining 
period of the chit on proportionate basis. Hence the 
present appeal. 
Assessees contended that, profits/loss accrued to 
the assessees only when the dividends exceeded the 
F discount paid and that difference could be known only 
on the termination of the chit when the total figure of 
dividend received and discount paid would be available. 
That, it would be possible for the assessees to make 
profits only when the sum total of the dividend received 
G exceeded the sum total of discounts suffered; that the 
Revenue has all along been accepting the Completed 
Contract Method and, therefore, there was no justification 
in law or In facts for deviating from the accepted practice; 
and that a chit transaction has been treated by the various 
H courts as one single scheme running for the full period 
. 
+ 
.. -
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI v. MIS BILAHARI 
479 
INVESTMENT (P) LTD . 
• 
and, therefore, according to the assessees, the Completed A 
• 
Contract Method adopted by it over the years was not 
required to be substituted by any other method of 
accounting. 
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 
B 
HELD: 1.1 Recognition/identification of income 
" { 
under the Income Tax Act is attainable by several methods 
of accounting and the same result could be attained by 
any one of the accounting methods. The Completed 
Contract Method is one such method. Similarly, c 
percentage of completion method is another such 
method. (Para - 15) (487-D] 
1.2 Under completed contract method, the revenue 
is not recognised until the contract is complete and costs 
are accumulated during the course of the contract. The D 
~ 
profit and loss is established in the last accounting per

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.