COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI versus M/S. PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI v. M/S. PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD. MAY 9, 2006 [ASHOK BHAN AND MARKANDEY KA TJU, JJ.] Customs duty-Exemption from under Customs Notification No.20199-Cus -Of imported 'Motion Capture Animation Files '-Held: The imported good in question is entitled to exemption under the Notification as the same is an 'Information Technology Software'. Words and Phrases: 'Sofiware'-Meaning of In the present appeal, the issue for consideration was whether the imported goods i.e. 'Motion Capture Animation Files' would come under the purview of Customs Notification No.20/99-Cus as 'information technology software' for claiming exemption from payment of duty. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The goods under import are computer software recorded A B c D in a machine readable form and capable of being manipulated by means E of an automatic data processing machine. 1145-C-D) 2. It cannot be said that the 'Capture Animation Files' are not software since another software is required to load the same. If software is required to load a programme on the computer then the programme which has to be loaded on the computer continues to be.software and F entitled to exemption under Notification No.20/90-Cus. (144-F-G) 3. The programming aids are also known as softwl!re and thus the goods in question would fall within the meaning of the word "software". The goods under import are admittedly data recorded on tapes. Under the existing Notification No.20/99 any kind of data in a machine readable G form and capable of being manipulated by means of an automatic data processing machine would be covered by the term "Information Technology Software". (145-A-C) Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary; Mc Graw Hill 139 H 140 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. A Enlyclopedia of Science and Technology and Encyclopedia Britannica, referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 2576 of2001 From the Judgment 10rder dated 22.8.2000 of CEGAT. South Zonal B Bench at Madras in Appeal No. C-314.'2000. B.B. Singh, K.Swami, Kumar Rajesh Singh for P. Parmeswaran, Advs., for the Appellant. V. Sridharan, Alok Yadav, Adv. for M.P. Devnath, Advs., for the C Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAN, J.: D The issue involved in the present case is : whether the imported goods, i.e. 'Motion Capture Animation Files" will come under the purview of Customs Notification No. 20/99 as 'information technology software' for claiming exemption from payment of duty? Respondent/assessee (for short "the Respondent imported "Motion E Capture Animation Files' valued at Rs. 7,02,58,125 and classified them under heading 85.24 and claimed exemption from payment of customs duty under notification No. 20/99-Cus. It will be convenient to refer to the relevant portion of the notification : F G H ''85.24 - (i) Information technology software, and (ii) Documt.nt of title conveying the right to use Information Technology software. Explanation : - "information technology Software 'means any representation of instructions, data, sound or image including source code and object code, recorded in a machine readable foun, and capable of being manipulated or providing interactivity to a user. by means of an automatic data processing machine. [Hereinafter referred to as the 'amended notification'] COMMR. OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI 1ยท. MIS PENT AMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD. [BHAN, J.] 141 It may be noted that this explanation substituted the explanation in the A earlier notification no. 23/98 which read as : "Explanation. - 'Computer software' means any representation of instructions, data, sound or image, including source code or object code, recorded in a machine readable fonn, and capable of being manipulated or providing interactivity to a user, by means of an automatic data processing machine falling under heading No. 84. 71, but does not include software required for operation of any machine performing a specific function other than data processing, and incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine. (Hereinafter referred to as the 'original notification] The assessing authority vide his order dated 25 .11.1999 denied the benefit of the notification although he did not dispute the classification of the goods under heading 85.24 as software. Against the order of the Assessing Authority, Respondent filed an appea
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex