COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR versus M/S. RAJASTHAN SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A
B
[2010] 8 S.C.R. 396
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR
v.
MIS. RAJASTHAN SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD.
(Civil Appeal No. 3760 of 2003 )
JULY 9, 2010
[D.K. JAIN AND C.K. PRASAD, JJ.]
Central Excise Rules, 1944:
c
Rule 570 - Steel plates and M. S. Channels used in the
D
fabrication of chimney for the diesel generating set - Fall
within the purview of serial no.5 of the Table below Rule 570
and thus entitled to modvat credit under the said rule - Central
Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapter 85.
The question which arose for consideration in the
present appeal was whether the tribunal was justified in
holding that the assessee was entitled to avail Modvat
Credit in respect of steel plates and M.S. channels used
in the fabrication of chimney for the diesel generating set,
E by treating these items as capital goods in terms of Rule
57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Dismissing the appeal, the Court
F
HELD: The Tribunal was correct in holding that the
assessee was entitled to avail of MODVAT credit in
respect of steel plates and M.S. channels used in the
fabrication of the chimney for the diesel generating set,
Applying the "user test" to the facts in hand, the steel
plates and M.S. Channels, used in the fabrication of the
G chimney would fall within the ambit of "capital goods" as
contemplated in Rule 57Q. It is not the case of the
Revenue that both these items are not required to be
used in the fabrication of the chimney, which is an
H
396
c""6MMNR-.' OF-CENTRAL.: EXCisE; JAiPUR v.
1RAJASTHAN, 397
SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LTD.
I
·~·
..
f·
- <'
.
.,
. :
\
'
,J
'
\
-
'Ii
•
'
tt
...
'
~. ~ ·-
/A
integral part of the diesel generating set, particularly. when
,
•
.
'I
,,
-
~.
}
~ tv
' •
·' ·
:
' •·' ''
•,
' '
the Pollution Control laws make .it mandatory that all
.' ,
· ·
.
.,
r
~·
'
:_,
.;-.
,.S
_.
•"'v
I·
.•J
plants which emit effluents should be so equipped with
apparatus _which _can reduce· or get rid of the effluent
gases. Therefore, any equipment used for.the said
purpose was to be treated as an accessory in terms of
serial,No~S of the goods described in cotumn'(2) of the
Table below Rule 57Q, '[Paras ·13;-14)-[402-H;- '403-A-C] '•
.-.'~;- . .'t
~
~I~
_·,
r"'
:! ... 1
'.~. j~
:·~L,i jl
L
··'}1-~_,,,.,...., !.'f f"I
.1
• Commissioner of central Exci$e, Coimbatore af?d-Ors.•.v.
_:B
Jawahar Mills Ltd. rand Ors.-(2001),6 SCC 274, reli~d~on.
:'c
' '
... · (2001)'
06 scc'274' .':: .. retie~ on·.1,,c;_, ·0 "' Pafa 6
(.;,-
,.. \'. "j_;,,
r
.~·t
•
'•
...,\.~
~{°L[.
1 ?1;(:
~t_.2.?":'~~~ 9,A.f '.1 ·,
..:;~'J{;:~
, - . CIVIL APPELLAT~' JURISDICTION~: Civil. Appeal No. '--D
3760 of 2003, ..
-.
_. ":--,. -. e•;·.·
y ... , _, i•J -,r .. -
' ,.
_,
, ·
~
r_J
-t. - t1.
~(. . .;'.":."..,. .. 1
'
1·F.: ;:_ b~
;-'.~
~- - /;,,r
-_ . From the Judgment .and Order dated 11.06.2002 of the
:¢ustoms, Exci_se an_d Gold .(Control) App~llate ·,Tr_ibu_n_al,
Northern Bench, l\lew Delhi in Final Order No. A/740/02-NB/
-
. . . .
"
--· .. - " -
.
-- - - . -· - -- -- -
-,E
~fy1] · ..... ·r:
.. ··} ~r-·
,,. 1P. ~~·)~· r.r e ."''.~ -::
~· r. 1.r •· \
. ,,
~;,..
\' '"·~~ o.""-.:
'· .·• ·_1,.,'
""il:
r
,...
•
0
C
;.,l
· . ..I
.• , ...... ,: ,j,
·
-:.,
_ ·
Hansh Chandra, Anurag·GuJ)ta; Rama Ram, Bmu Tamta,
... ,..
~
'"
I
I
•
\·
,~
"
"'
T
,
°'t
'
\
"•
r
~ish~_~:sanc~a,ti an9cAni~ ~f~iy~r!or,th~ A,_pp~tl~nt: _ · L ~. n!
1 B.L.• Narsimhan, Alok'Yadav and M.P. Devariath for the -F
Respondent.·· ·· · - :·
h <~~_--,·
1 .: •• ·c •.
;-.,. • >·,
,.,
... i
4·Jnr· ~·'
~-
~
1
...... ··.,' .~
•
·
• ..
•
{i~1 ,.,b'
~,
The Judgment of the Court was d1elivered by
I• .
,"
,,
,'
·..,.]....,;
:
~· ,, ''.,'i•,·" 1j,(,·,~"
T'11~:l~·
.,
'\ ".1i' ~~
: r D.K, JAIN; J.1. Challenge in this appeal, by special leave,
_is to the order dated 11th June, 2002 passed by the Customs, ~G
Excise and Gold (Control)• App~llate _Tribunal ,(for short :'the
Tribunal"), as it existed then, in Appeal No:E/725/2001-NB(SM).
By the impugned, order,; the Tribunal has. held. that: the
respondent (for short,"the assessee")· is :entitled• to: avail of
MODVAT credit in respect of steel plates and M.S. channels
H
398
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
(2010] 8 S.C.R.
A used in the fabrication of chimney for the diesel generating set,
by treating these items as capital goods in terms of Rule 570
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex