LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE versus MIS. WOOD POLYMERS LTD. ETC.

Citation: [1997] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 528 · Decided: 17-12-1997 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.C. AGRAWAL · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE 
v. 
MIS. WOOD POLYMERS LTD. ETC. 
DECEMBER 17, 1997 
B 
(S.C. AGRAWAL AND D.P. WADHWA, JJ.J 
Excise Law: 
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 : 
c 
Sub-headings 3920.31/3920.37, 4818.90/4823.40 (as inserted in 1997) 
and Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule, Rules 3(b) and I-Ap-
plicability of-Paper-based decorative laminated sheets-Held, classifiable 
under Sub-heading 3920.31 until 28.2.1988 and w.e.f 1.3.1988 under sub-
heading 3920.37 and not under Sub-headings 4818.90 or. under 
D 4823.90-Classiftcation has to be done in accordance with the Rules for the 
Interpretation of the Schedule and not on the basis of common parlance 
test-Rule 3(b) and not Rule 1 of the said 1Ules is applicable in the present 
case-Insertion of new sub-heading 4823.40 in Chapter 48 from 1997 does 
not enable decorative laminates to be classified under Chapter 48 for the 
E earlier peliod. 
Sub-headings 3920.31/3920.37 or 3920.90/3926.90-Cotton fab1ic-based 
laminated decorative boards-Held, classifiable under Sub-heading 
3922.90/3926 .. 90. 
F 
Sub-heading 8546.00 or 3920.21-Paper-based insulators elec/:lical 
grade-Classification of-CEGAT rightly classified it under Sub-heading 
8546.00 and not wider Sub-heading 3920.21. 
Notification No. 135/89-CE dated 12.5.1989-Concession-Paper-
based decorative laminated sheets-Whether eligible for concessional rate of 
G duty under Notification 135/89-CE dated 12.5.1989 for goods falling under 
Sub-heading 4823.90-Although only Notification No. 144/94-CE dated 
22.12.1994 amending Notification No. 20194 dated 1.3. 1994 had excluded 
decorative laminates from the benefit of the concessional rates, even dwing 
the preceding pe1iod-Held, not eligible for concessional rate of duty as prior 
H to 1997 they did not fall under Sub-heading 4823.90-Central Excise Tariff 
528 
I 
; 
'\I 
-~ 
•, 
C. C. E. i•. WOOD POLYMERS LTD. 
529 
Act, 1985, Sub-heading 4823. 90---Uoods-Paper based decorative laminated A 
sheets--Central Excise and Salt Act 1944, Section 5-A. 
The respondent was a. manufacturer of paper based decorative 
laminated sheets, cotton fabric-based laminates and paper-based in-
sulators electrical grades. These products were classified by the Assistant 
Collector under Sub-heading 392031 and the same was approved by the B 
Collector (Appeals). On further appeal, the CEGAT held that paper based 
decorative laminated sheets/boards are classifiable under sub-heading 
4818.90 till 28.2.1988 and under Heading 4823.90 on and after 13.1988, and 
that cotton fabric based laminates are classifiable under Heading 3922.90 
till 28.2.1988 and under Heading 3926.90 on and after 1.3.1988. As regards c 
paper-based insulators it was held the same was classifiable under Head-
ing 8546.00. Hence this appeal by the Revenue. 
The Revenue contended that the classification of these products 
concluded in view of the decision of this Court in Bakelite Hy/am* case. 
The respondent-assessee contended that proper test applicable for clas-
D 
sification was the "common parlance test" and that so tested paper based 
decorative laminated sheets primarily fell under Chapter 48 and not under 
Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. It was further contended by 
the respondent asses see that Rule 1 and Rule 3 of the Rule of Interpreta· 
tion could be invoked for determining the classification of decorative E 
laminated sheets. It was also contended by the respondent-assessee that 
in 1997 insertion of a new Sub-heading 4823.40 in Chapter 48 showed that 
decorative laminates was an article of paper. 
Allowing the appeals preferred by the assessee and dismissing the 
Revenue's appeals, this Court. 
F 
HELD : 1.1. In view of the rules regarding interpretation contained 
in the Central Excise Tariff Act, the matter of classifications has to be 
considered in the light of the said rules. Since decorative laminates are 
composite goods made from different components, namely, paper and 
G 
chemical solutions with which it is impregnated, the dassification of 
decorative laminates has to be determined in the light of Rule 3(b). As a 
result of impregnation with the chemical solutions the character of paper 
is changed into decorative laminates and it is the chemical solutions which 
gives them their essential character. Since the decorative laminated sheets 
are hard and rigid in character, they are classifiable under Chapter 39 and H 
,. 
530 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1997) SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 
A no

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.