LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

COL. RAMNEESH PAL SINGH versus SUGANDHI AGGARWAL

Citation: [2024] 6 S.C.R. 259 · Decided: 08-05-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: VIKRAM NATH · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 10 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

* Author
[2024] 6 S.C.R. 259 : 2024 INSC 397
Col. Ramneesh Pal Singh  
v. 
Sugandhi Aggarwal
(Civil Appeal No. 6137 of 2024)
08 May 2024 
[Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Matter pertains to the guardianship of two minor children till they 
attain the age of majority.
Headnotes
Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 – ss. 7, 9 and 25 – Custody 
of two minor children – Family Court granted permanent 
custody of minor children to the father-serving Army Officer 
and provided visitation rights to the mother – However, the 
High Court set aside the order and granted the parties shared 
custody of the minor children – Challenge to:
Held: Principal consideration whilst deciding an application for 
guardianship under the Act in exercise of its parens patriae 
jurisdiction would be the ‘welfare’ of the minor children – Dispute 
must be decided on the basis of a holistic and all encompassing 
approach including inter alia the socio economic and educational 
opportunities made available to the minor children; healthcare and 
overall well being of the children; the ability to provide physical 
surroundings conducive to growing adolescents; the preference 
of the minor children as also stability of surroundings of the minor 
children – On facts, unwavering and strong desire of the children to 
continue to reside with the father – Said desire/preference although 
in itself cannot be determinative of custody of the children, but must 
be given due consideration – As regards, upbringing and welfare 
of the minor children, the Indian Armed Forces provides a robust 
support system to the kin of its officers which undoubtedly, aids in the 
mental stimulation, growth and overall development of personality 
of a child – Nothing on record to suggest that the interests and 
welfare of the minor children were in any manner affected during 
their stay with the father – Furthermore, the father could not have 
been said to have engaged or propagated ‘alienating behaviour’ as 
alleged by the mother – High Court failed to appreciate the said 
260
[2024] 6 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
nuance and proceeded on an unsubstantiated assumption that 
allegations of parental alienation could not be ruled out, despite 
the stark absence of any instances of ‘alienating behaviour’ having 
been identified by any Court – High Court neither correct nor 
justified in interfering with the order passed by the Family Court 
– In view thereof, it is just and appropriate that the custody of the 
minor children is retained by the father, subject to the visitation 
rights of the mother as granted by the Family Court. [Paras 8, 12, 
13, 14, 16, 24-27]
Child and family welfare – Child custody dispute – ‘Parental 
alienation syndrome’-PAS – Concept of:
Held: ‘Parental alienation syndrome’-PAS is a thoroughly 
convoluted and intricate phenomenon requiring serious 
consideration and deliberation – Recognising and appreciating 
the repercussions of PAS certainly shed light on the realities of 
longdrawn and bitter custody and divorce litigations on a certain 
identified sect of families – However, there can be no straitjacket 
formula to invoke the principle of PAS laid down by this Court in 
*Vivek Singh’s case – Courts ought not to prematurely and without 
identification of individual instances of ‘alienating behaviour’, 
label any parent as propagator and/or potential promoter of such 
behaviour – Said label has far-reaching implications which must 
not be imputed or attributed to an individual parent routinely – 
Courts must endeavour to identify individual instances of ‘alienating 
behaviour’in order to invoke the principle of parental alienation so 
as to overcome the preference indicated by the minor children. 
[Paras 18-20, 22, 23]
Child and family welfare – Child custody dispute – Upbringing 
and welfare of the minor children – Effect of the nature of 
employment of father serving in Indian Armed forces:
Held: Indian Armed Forces provides a robust support system to 
the kin of its officers so as to ensure minimal disruption in the 
lives of the civilian members of an officer’s family – This support 
system includes residential accommodation, a network of army 
schools, hospitals and healthcare facilities – Moreover, various 
extra-curricular activities, recreational clubs; and other social 
and cultural functions are made available for the benefit of the 
kin of officers of the Indian Armed Forces – Said support system 
undoubted

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.