LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

CHANDRAMANI NANDA versus SARAT CHANDRA SWAIN AND ANOTHER

Citation: [2024] 10 S.C.R. 920 · Decided: 15-10-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.K. MAHESHWARI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 10 S.C.R. 920 : 2024 INSC 777
Chandramani Nanda  
v. 
Sarat Chandra Swain and Another 
(Civil Appeal No. 11100 of 2024)
15 October 2024
[J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Appellant-claimant, if entitled to enhancement of compensation.
Headnotesโ€ 
Motor Accident Claim โ€“ Compensation โ€“ Assessment โ€“ 
Enhancement of compensation โ€“ Appellant-claimant having 
suffered injuries in an accident became mentally unstable 
with 100% functional disability โ€“ Compensation of โ‚น20,60,385/- 
awarded by the Tribunal was modified and enhanced to 
โ‚น30,99,873/- by the High Court โ€“ Challenge to:
Held: An enhanced income should be considered for calculation 
of compensation โ€“ However, the courts below assessed the 
appellantโ€™s annual income at โ‚น1,62,420/- by wrongly relying on 
his Income Tax return from 02 years before the accident โ€“ Income 
of the appellant based on the income tax returns produced on 
record is progressive, annual income taken at โ‚น2,00,000/- โ€“  
Appellant also entitled for enhancement on account of future 
prospects, given he was 32 years at the time of accident, he 
is entitled to 40% future prospects โ€“ Further, โ‚น1,00,000/- also 
awarded each on account of future attendant charges, loss of 
marriage prospects and pain and suffering as the appellant 
became mentally unstable having disability of 60% which resulted 
in 100% functional disability โ€“ Order of the High Court modified,  
appellant entitled to enhanced compensation of โ‚น52,31,000/- at 
6% interest. [Paras 14, 14.1, 14.3, 18, 19, 22]
Motor Accident Claim โ€“ Compensation โ€“ Awarding more 
compensation than the amount claimed โ€“ Permissibility โ€“ Plea 
of the insurance company that the appellant filed petition 
*โ€ƒAuthor
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 
921
Chandramani Nanda v. Sarat Chandra Swain and Another
claiming compensation of โ‚น30,00,000/- and since the same 
was awarded by the High Court, no further enhancement is 
possible:
Held: Rejected โ€“ Amount of compensation claimed is not a bar 
to award more than what is claimed, provided it is found to be 
just and reasonable โ€“ It is the duty of the Court to assess fair 
compensation โ€“ Rough calculation made by the claimant is not 
a bar or the upper limit. [Para 20]
Case Law Cited
Sarla Verma (Smt.) and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and 
another [2009] 5 SCR 1098 : (2009) 6 SCC 121 : 2009 INSC 506; 
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Others 
[2017] 13 SCR 100 : (2017) 16 SCC 680 : 2017 INSC 1068; 
Meena Devi vs. Nunu Chand Mahto [2022] 18 SCR 449 : (2023) 
1 SCC 204 : 2022 INSC 1080 โ€“ referred to.
List of Acts
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Penal Code, 1860.
List of Keywords
Motor Accident; Insurance company; Compensation; Enhancement 
of compensation; Compensation enhanced; Brain surgery; Brain 
injury; Mentally unstable; 100% functional disability; Income Tax 
returns; Future prospects; Future attendant charges; Loss of 
marriage prospects; Pain and suffering; Rough calculation; Fair 
compensation; Annual income; Enhanced income.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 11100 of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 24.08.2022 of the High Court 
of Orissa at Cuttack in MACA No. 256 of 2019
Appearances for Parties
Chitta Ranjan Mishra, Avinash Kumar Jain, Shakti Kanta Pattanaik, 
Advs. for the Appellant.
Amit Kumar Singh, Ms. K Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, 
Prang Newmai, Advs. for the Respondents.
922
[2024] 10 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
Rajesh Bindal, J.
1.	
Leave granted.
2.	
The claimant, in a motor vehicle accident having suffered injuries, 
has filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. 
He is aggrieved by the order1 passed by the High Court.2 
3.	
The facts as available on record are that on 16.01.2014 four persons 
occupying Verito Vibe Car bearing Registration No.OD-05-D-9596 
were travelling from Sambalpur, Odisha to Cuttack. At about 01:30 
pm, the offending Bus bearing Registration No.OD-14-A-1774 being 
driven at high speed struck against the said car on NH-55 near CPP 
Chawk, NALCO, Anugul, Odisha, as a result of which the occupants 
of the car suffered serious injuries. One of the occupants, Ranjan 
Rout, succumbed to the injuries on 31.05.2017. A police case 
bearing P.S. Case No.7/2014 was registered against the driver of 
the offending bus under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of IPC.3 Three 
injured occupants of the car and the legal heirs of the deceased

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.