CHAIRMAN, BHARTIA EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. versus STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2011] 2 S.C.R. 461 CHAIRMAN, BHARTIA EDUCATION SOCIE_TY & ANR. v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1227 of 2011) FEBRUARY 02, 2011 [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND A.K. PATNAIK, JJ.] . Education/Educational Institutions: A B National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1933: c s. 14 - Recognition of Institutions offering course or training in teacher education - Teacher Training Institute run by appellant society - Recognition of Institute by National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) for conducting two year Junior Basic Training (JBT) from the academic session D 2000 - 2001 - Grant of affiliation to the lns(itute for the JBT course (2001-2003) by State Board of School Education - Admission of 160 students to the two year JBT course in year · 1999 - Grant of one-time relaxation in respect of students admitted by the Institute for the academic session 1999 - 2001 E and direction to the Board to conduct examination - 68 students found eligible out of 160 and permitted to take examination and their result was announced - Remaining 92 students were found ineligible but were permitte(i to take the first year examination - However, their results were not F announced· nor were permitted to take 'second year examination - Writ Petition by the 92 students seeking direction to the Board to decfare their first year results and conduct the second year examination - Di~missed by the High Court - On appeal, held: Practice of admitting students G by unrecognized institutions and then seeking permission for the students to appear for the examinations cannot be accepted .- Having regard to the plovisions o~ the NCTE Act, bef9._re NCTE granted recognition on 17. 7.20<)0, the Institute 461 H i 462 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 2 S.C.R. A could not offer the JBT course nor admit any students to such course - Tfiere was no recognition in the year 1999 - Therefore, the admissions made by the Institute in the year 1999 for the academic session 1999-2001 are illegal and irregular and could not be approved, recognised or · B regularised - The fact that the admissions of 68 students of 1999-2001 batch had been regularized cannot be a ground to perpetuate an illegality by requiring the Board to conduct the examinations for the remaining 92 students admitted in the year 1999 or declare their results - Thus, order of the High c Court does not call for interference. D N. M. Nageshwaramma vs. State of AP (1986) Supp. SCC 166; A.P. Christian Medical Education Society vs. Government of AP (1986) 2 SCC 667; State of Maharashtra vs. Vikas Sahelrao Roundale (1992) 4 SCC 435 - relied on . . State of Tamil Nadu vs. St. Joseph Teachers Training Institute (1991) 3 SCC 87 - referred to. s. 14(6) - Grant of affiliation to the Institution, where E recognition has been granted - Recognition of Institute for conducting two years Junior Basic Training (JBT) course in the year 2000 - Grant of affiliation to the Institute for the JBT course (2001-2003), however, affiliation for subsequent JBT course not granted - Affiliation granted to the institute only for the year 2009 - Admission of student to the JBT course F in the year 2002 and 2003 - Writ petitions seeking a direction to the Board to conduct the examinations for the academic session 2002-2004, and to grant affiliation to the Institute and permit students of 2003-2005 batch to appear for examination ·G r respectively - Disposed of, by the High Court - Direction issued to refund the fees paid by the students and pay Rs 50, 0001- as damages - On appeal, held: An institution requires the recognition of NCTE as well as affiliation with the examining body, before it can offer a course or training in teacher education or admit students-to such course or training H - Sub-section (6) of Section 14 mandates evety examining ' CHAIRMAN, BHARTIA EDUCATION SOC. v. STATE 463 OF HIMACHAL PRADESH body to grant affiliation to the institution on receipt of the orqer A of NCTE granting recognition to such institution - Recognifion is a condition precedent for affiliation - Further, sub-section (6) of section 14 cannot be interpreted in a manner so as to make the process bf affiliation, an automatic rubber-stamping consequent upon recognition, without any kind of discretion · B in the examining body to examine whether the institution deserves affiliation or not, independent of the recognition - · On facts, the Institute apparentl
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex