C.B.S.E. AND ANR versus P. SUNIL KUMAR AND ORS. ETC.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
C.B.S.E. AND ANR. v. P. SUNIL KUMAR AND ORS. ETC. MAY 12, 1998 [SUJATA V. MANOHAR AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.] Constitution of India, Article 226-Students of institutions not affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)-Whether High Court can by an interim order permit them to sit for Board exam-Whether CBSE should A B be compelled to issue certificates to successful students of institutions still C not affiliated-Held, no; would tantamount to subversion of law-Education- CBSE. Students of classes IO and 12 of certain educational institutions in Kerala were refused permission to sit for the examination conducted by the D Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) since their institution was not affiliated to the CBSE. The Single Judge of the Kerala High Court, by an interim order, permitted the students to appear for the examination and further directed that the certificates granted would be subject to the result of the writ petitions. The Division Bench, taking a compassionate view of the. matter and being of the opinion that students who had been permitted to E appear for the examination should not suffer, modified the condition and directed that the certificate granted should be without any restriction. The CBSE appealed to this Court. Allowing the appeal, this Court F HELD : To permit students of an unaffiliated institution to appear at the examination conducted by the Board under orders of the court and then to compel the Board to issue certificates in favour of those who have undertaken examination would tantamount to subversion of law. The Court would not be justified in sustaining the orders issued by the High Court on G misplaced sympathy in favour of the students. [331-H; 332-A] A.P. Christians Medical Educational Society v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, [1986) 2 SCC 667; State of Tamil Nadu v. St. Joseph Teachers Training Institute, JT (1991) 2 SC 343; State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale, JT (1992) 5 SC 175 and Guru Nanak Dev University H 327 328 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1998)3 S.C.R. ' . A .v. Parminder Kr. Bansal, [1993] 4 sec 401, referred to. Central Board of Secondary Education·v. Nikhil Gulati, (1998] 3 SCC 5, distinguished. · CIVIL AP~ELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 2662 of_l998 B Etc._ _ . From the Judgment and Order dated 18.6.97 of the Kerala High Court in O.P. No:2400of1996· . Altaf Ahmad, Additional Solicitor General, T.L.V_ Iyer, R.P. C Krishnamoorthy, Tara Chandra Sharma, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Ajay Sharma, Rupesh Kumar, Subramonium Prasad, Romy Chacko, Ms. V. Mohana, S. Nanda Kumar, L.K: Pandey and Ramesh Babu M.R., (Ms. Malani Poduval) for State of Kerala ror:the appearing parties. i D Th6 Judgment of the Court was delive~ed by PA IT ANAIK, J. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions. These six appeals filed by the C~ntral Board_ of Secondary Education are directed against the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court dated 18.6._1997 disposing of Writ Appeal Nos. 949/97, 978/97, 285/ E 96, 300/96 as 'wen as the two Original Petitions filed before the Division Bench, namely, O.P. Nos. 2400/96 and 3559/96. The question that arises for consideration is : whether students studying in institutions not affiliated to the Board of Secondary Education can be permitted by the High Court by an · . __ interim order to _appear at the examination conducted by the Board and F ultimately can the Board be compelled to issue certificates to those students who have appeared ~t the examination pursuance to the interim direction of the. court notwithstanding the fact that the institutions where the students were prosecuting their study have not ye~received affiliation of the Central · Board of Secondary Education? Writ Appeals 949/97 and 978/97 had been preferred by the Board-Appellant, against the order of the learned single G Judge dated 6.2.1997 by which_ order the Board was directed to allow the students ofSree Narayan Vidhya Bhavan, Chandrappinny, Thrissur to appear at the examination conducted by the Board. The learned single Judge had· _, indicated that the said order is being passed in the peculiar circumstances of the case without the matter being treated as a precedent. TI1e learned Judge H also further directed that the question of affiliation to Devi Academy Educational C.B.S.E. v. P.S. KUMAR [PATTANAIK, J.) 329 Society, Guruvayoor will be decided by the Board. Writ
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex