LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION CO. OF INDIA LTD., AND ANOTHER versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS (AND CONNECTED APPEAL)

Citation: [1961] 1 S.C.R. 902 · Decided: 27-09-1960 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.K. DAS · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

L. llu:an ,\Jal 
Kath1ulu 
, .. 
J'Ju ftlC01Jlf·ltlX 
UfJictY, sp~ctaJ 
Circlt, AmlnJ/ll 
Can!t. 
902 
SUPREME COURT REPOHTS 
[ I9&I] 
sub-s. (5) that "Income-tax Offic<•rs shall perform 
their functiorrn in respect of such persons ...... as the 
Commi~Hioner ...... may ...... direct" <inly show that the 
CommiAsioner mn.y direct that one Income-tax Officer 
Ahall not and !!notlwr lncomr-t-Rx Cfficer sl1all, per-
form the functions in respect of such and such pnson 
or per80lls. 
The plural i11cluding the singular, the 
order of thu Commissio11cr waH valid, becausu he 
arra11ged aud distrilrnted work, and <lid not- se"k to 
transfer any ca~e. It is, however, contemlcd that 
this renders suL-s. (7 A) otioso. In 01u· opi11iu11, it does 
nut. 
Special 1irovisiu11 for transfer of pe11ding <'ases 
is ·~JI that i". provided there, aud if ouch a transfer 
takes pla<'e, the proviBions of sub-s. (7A) will be 
invoked. 
Tho8P provisions are to be rllad as 11ut pre-
judicing the g<'11eral powers granted b) sub-s. (5) and 
vice versa. 
For these reasons, tlie appeal fails, r.nd will ho dis-
missed with eusts. 
Appeal dismi.ssed. 
BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE AN'D 
DISTRIBUTING CO., OF INDIA, LTD, AND 
ANOTHER 
v. 
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFJ.<'JCER AND 
OTHERS 
(A~D CONNECTgD APPEAL) 
(S. K. DAS, M. HmAYATUI.LAn, K. C. Ihs GUPTA, 
J.C. SHAH and X. HAJAGOPALA AYYA:SOAR, ,JJ.) 
Sales Tax-Sale of motor spirit for aviation purposes lo aircraft 
"' Ai"rport-Exemption from taxation-_Sale outside custu1ns barrier 
---'J.t'hether salt u·itl1in State--A.viatio1i sp;rit loaded 011 
board 
aircraft taken out of cotrnlry-lf exported-" J::xport ", meamng of 
-Bengal Motor Spint Sal<S Taxation Act, 1y41 (Beu. 5 of 1941), 
"22, as amcnded-Co11slitutio11 of hidia, Art 286(1)(a)(b). J::xpla-
nation. 
.-
, 
' 
1 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
903 
l'he apptllant companies which \Vere, carrying on, husiness 
J9tl•J 
in Calcutta in petroleum and petroleum products maintained 
--
. 
supply depots at Dum Dum Airport from which motor spirit for Bunnah .shell Oil 
the purposes of aviation was sold and delivered to aircraft which 
Storage and 
either proceeded to foreign countries directly from that Airport Distributing Co .• 
or did so ultimately. though landing en route at some place or 
of India Ltd. 
places in the Indian territory. Dum Dum Airport was a customs 
v. 
aerodrome and all aircraft coming into it or leaving it had to 
Connnercial 
• 
comply with ordinary customs formalities. The sales tax autho-
.Tax Officer 
rities of West Bengal sought to levy tax on the sales of motor 
spirit as aforesaid under the provisions of the Bengal Motor 
Spirit Sales Taxation Act. 1941. as amended. 
The appellant 
companies claimed that the sales were exempted from taxation 
under both the clauses (a) and (b) of Art. 286(1) of the Constitu-
tion of India on the grounds (1) that the sales in question had 
taken place outside the State of West Bengal. as they did not 
come within the Explanation to Art. 286(1)(a). (2) that aviation 
spirit was delivered outside the customs barrier and therefore 
the sales were outside the State. and (3) that the sales had taken 
place in the course of export, as aviation spirit was taken out of 
the territory.of India. 
Held: (r) that by sale in Art. 28li(1)(a) is meant a complet-
ed transaction by which property in the goods passes. Before 
property in the goods passes the contract of sale is only execu-
. tory aµd the buyer has only a chose in action. The taxable 
event is not to be found at an earlier stage because the critical 
taxable event is the passing of property. 
The Explanation to cl. (1) of Art. 286 was added to avoid, 
among .other things. multiple taxation of the same transaction. 
It indicates the State where the tax can be levied and also the 
State where it cannot.· It achieves it by excluding from con-
sideration the place where the property in the goods passed 
according to the law relating to sale of goods. The non obstanle 
. clause establishes this. By the fiction created hy the Explana-
tion a sale is deemed lo have taken place in the State where the 
goods are delivered as a direct result of the sale for purposes of 
consumption in that State .. 
Where there are more States than one involved; any State 
claiming to tax a sale by reason of something anterior to the 
passing of property would not be able to claim that the sale took 
place there unless it was also the State of delivery. 
The Explanaiion is meant to e

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.