LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BUDHADEV KARMASKAR versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation: [2011] 9 S.C.R. 680 · Decided: 02-08-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011] 9 S.C.R. 680 
... 
A 
BUDHADEV KARMASKAR 
v. 
STATE OF WEST BENGAL 
(Criminal Appeal No. 135 of 2010) 
• 
B 
AUGUST 02, 2011 
~ 
[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] 
Public Interest Litigation - Issue as regards the problems 
of sex workers in the country - Held: Sex workers are also 
c human beings and thus, are entitled to a life of dignity - Sex 
workers can lead a life of dignity if they earn their livelihood 
through their technical skills instead of selling their bodies -
Thus, panel consisting of senior advocates and NGO 
• 
constituted by Supreme Court, to monitor rehabilitation of sex 
D workers - The Secretaries, Social Welfare Departments of the 
~ 
State Governments and the Central Government to meet the 
panel constituted to discuss how proper schemes in the spirit 
of the order by this Court can be prepared - Thereafter, the 
State and the Centre to come out with the schemes/ 
E suggestions indicating rehabilitation of sex workers, effective 
feedback as regards rehabilitation with a list of sex workers 
willing for rehabilitation - Panel constituted to submit another 
report of the progress made by the next date of hearing -
,• 
Social welfare - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21. 
F 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal 
No. 135 of 2010. 
From the Judgment & Order dated 25.07.2007 of the High 
Court of Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No. 487 of 2004. 
G 
• 
• 
P.P. Malhotra, ASG Pradip Ghosh, Jayant Bhushan, T.S. 
Doabia, Ashok Bhan, Ratnakar Dash, I. Venkatanarayana, R. 
Sundravaradan, A. Maria;putham, AG, Dr. Manish Singhvi, 
Shail Kr. Dwivedi, Manjit Singh, AAG, Pijush K. Roy, Reena 
H 
680 
BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST 
681 
i ... 
BENGAL 
George, Gautam Talukdar, Lajja Ram, Gaurav Sharma, D.S. 
A 
Mahra, Sushma Suri, Sadhana Sandhu, Mohd. Khairati, lrshad 
Ahmad, Vijay Verma, Anitha Shenoy, Ashutosh Sharma, Alka 
~ 
Sinha, Anuvrat Sharma, D. Mahesh Babu, Ramesk Allanki, V. 
Pattabhi Ram, Savita Dhanda, Ranjan Mozumbar (for Corporate 
~ 
Law Group) Anil Srivastava, Rituraj Biswas, Gopal Singh, 
B 
Manish Kumar, Anjani Aiyag·ari, S. wasim A. Quadiri, Anil 
Katiyar, Hemantika vyahi, Suveni Banerjee, Ashwini Kumar, 
Tarjit Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Abhishek Sood, Rohit Kr. 
Singh, Sunil Fernandes, Astha Sharma, P.V. Dinesh, Jogy 
Scaria, Sanjay Kharde (for Asha G. Nair), Kh. No~in Singh, c 
Balaji Srinivasan, Radha Shyam Jena, Kuldip Singh, R.K. 
Pandey, H.S. Sandhu, K.K. Pandey, Mohit Mudgil, Aruna 
·~ 
Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Yusuf Khan, Megha Gaur, 
Arputham Aruna & Co., Aniruddha P. Mayee, Abhijit Sengupta, 
": 
B.P. Yadav, Anima Kujur, Anil K. Jha, Dharmendra Kr. Sinha, 
D 
Chhaya Kumari, V.G. Pragasam, S.J. Aristotle, Prabu 
Ramasubramanian, Savita Singh, Anand Grover, Tripti Tandon, 
Shivangi Rai, Amritananda Chakraborty, Shefali Malhotra, 
Prakash Kumar Singh, Ravi Kant, A. Subhashini, Aishwarya 
Bhati, C.D. Singh, K.N. Madhusoodhanan, M.T. George, 
E 
Subramonium Prasad, Sunil Kumar, Singh, Mukti Singh, 
Jatinder Kr. Bhatia, Manpreet Sing Doabia, Kiran Bhardwaj, 
Edward Belho, A. Athuimei R. Naga, K. lnatoli Serna, Nimshim 
,~, 
Voshum, Ranjan Mukherjee for the appearing parties. 
:r 
The following order of the Court was delivered 
F 
ORDER 
"Pinha tha daam-e-sakht qareeb aashiyaan ke 
\ 
Udhne hi na paaye the ki giraftaar hum hue" 
G 
Mirza Ghalib 
1. This exercise was initiated by us by our order dated 14th 
February 2011. By that order we dismissed the appeal of the 
appellant, who was convicted for murdering a sex worker in a H 
682 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[20111 9 S.C.R. 
.... 
' 
A red light area in Kolkata by battering her head repeatedly 
against the wall and the floor of a room. Having dismissed the 
appeal we suo motu converted the case into a PIL by the same 
order in order to address the problems of sex workers in the 
country. 
• 
B 
• 
2. In our order dated 14th February, 2011 we observed: 
"This is a case of brutal murder of a sex worker. Sex 
workers are also human beings and no one has a right to 
assault or murder them. A person becomes a prostitute 
c 
not because she enjoys it but because of poverty. Society 
must have sympathy towards the sex workers and must not 
look down upon them. They are also entitled to a life of 
dignity in view of Article 21 of the Constitution. 
• 
D 
In the novels and stories of the great Bengali writer 
Sharat Chandra Chattopadhyaya, many prostitutes have 
been sh.own to be women of very high character, 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.