LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

BUDHADEV KARMASKAR versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation: [2011] 2 S.C.R. 925 · Decided: 14-02-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011] 2 S.C.R. 925 
BUDHAOEV KARMASKAR 
v. 
STATE OF WEST BENGAL 
(Criminal Appeal No. 135 of 2010) 
FEBRUARY 14, 2011 
[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] 
A 
B 
Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Brutal murder of a sex 
worker - Conviction and sentence u/s. 302, by the courts 
below - Justification of - Held: Justified - Injuries show C 
brutality of the crime - Head of the deceased was battered 
again and again in a hideous and barbaric manner -
Testimony of the eye-witnesses corroborates the medical 
evidence - Accused having committed murder in a brutal 
manner of a helpless woman, deserves no sympathy - Thus, 
D 
order of conviction upheld - Crime against women. 
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Sex workers/ 
prostitutes - Right to live with dignity under Article 21 - Held: 
Sex workers/prostitutes are entitled to live with dignity under E 
Article 21 - Since they are human beings, their problems 
. need to be addressed - No one has right to assault or murder 
them - Direction to the Central and the State Governments 
to prepare schemes for giving technical/vocational training to 
sex workers and sexually abused women in all cities in India. 
F 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal 
No. 135 of 2010. 
From the Judgment & Order dated 25.7.2007 of the High 
Court at Calcutta in C.R.A. No. 487 of 2004. 
ยท 
Lajja Ram for the Appellant. 
T.C. Sharma, Neelam Sharma for the Respondent. 
925 
G 
H 
926 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2011) 2 S.C.R. 
A 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
ORDER 
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 
B 
This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment 
and order dated 25th July, 2007 passed by the High Court of 
Calcutta in C.R.A. No. 487 of 2004. 
The facts have been set out in the impugned judgment and 
C 
hence we are not repeating the same here except wherever 
necessary. 
This is a case of brutal murder of a sex worker. Sex 
workers are also human beings and no one has a right to 
assault or murder them. A person becomes a prostitute not 
D 
because she enjoys it but because of poverty. Society must 
have sympathy towards the sex workers and must not look 
down upon them. They are also entitled to a life of dignity in 
view of Article 21 of the Constitution. 
E 
In the novels and stories of the great Bengali Writer Sharat 
Chand Chattopadhyaya, many prostitutes have been shown to 
be women of very high character, e.g., Rajyalakshmi in 
'Shrikant', Chandramukhi in 'Devdas' etc. The plight of 
prostitutes has been depicted by the great Urdu poet Sahil 
F 
Ludhianvi in his poem 'Chakle' which has been sung in the 
Hindi film Pyasa "Jineh Naaz Hai Hind Per wo kahan hain" 
(simplified version of the verse 'Sana Khwan- e-taqdees-e-
Mashrik Kahan Hain'). 
We may also refer to the character Sonya Marmelodov in 
G 
Dostoyevsky's famous novel 'Crime and Punishment'. Sonya 
is depicted as a girl who sacrifices her body to earn some 
bread for her impoverished family. 
Reference may also be made to Amrapali, who was a 
H 
contemporary of Lord Buddha. 
BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST 
927 
. 
BENGAL 
' 
In the present case, the incident happened on 17th A 
September, 1999 at about 9.15 p.m. The deceased Chayay 
Rani Pal alias Buri was living in a red light area and was 
aresident of Room No.8 of Premises No.19, Jogen Dutta Lane 
in Calcutta. She was evidently a sex worker. The appellant 
Budhadev kicked her with fists and legs, and she fell down on 
B 
the floor. The appellant then caught her by her hair and banged 
her head against the floor and the wall several times which left 
the victim bleeding from her ear, nose and head. The incident 
was witnessed by four persons, Pw2-Abida, PW4- Maya, PW7-
Asha and PW8-Parvati. 
c 
PW2-Abida has deposed that she saw the appellant-
accused catching the victim by her hair and banging her head 
against the wall. The victim was profusely bleeding through her 
nose and mouth. On seeing this, Abida started shouting and 
then the accused pushed her and went down and fled away. D 
PW8-Paivati saw the victim being mercilessly beaten by the 
accused-appellant, and the same is the evidence of PW7-Asha. 
In the post mortem, as many as 11 injuries on the body of the 
victim were found, eight of which were on various parts of the 
face and forehead. 
E 
The police was informed about the incident over the 
telephone as is evident from the testimony of PW2 Abida. After 
the police arrived on the spot, sample of the blood sp

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.