LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

BRIJ LAL & ORS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

Citation: [2010] 11 S.C.R. 1167 · Decided: 21-10-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.H. KAPADIA · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2010) 11 S.C.R. 1167 
BRIJ LAL & ORS. 
v. 
COMMI~ SIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR 
(Civil Appeal No. 516-527 OF 2004) 
OCTOBER 21, 2010 
[S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, K.S. 
PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN, SURINDER SINGH 
NIJJAR AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] 
INCOME TAX ACT, 1961: 
A 
B 
c 
CHAPTER X1X-A - Sections 245-C, 245-0 (1) and 245-
0(4) rlw s. 234-B - Settlement Commission - Settlement of 
cases - Interest for default in payment of advance tax -
Applicability of s. 234-B - Held: Sections 234-A, 234-B and 
0 
234-C are applicable to the proceedings of the Settlement 
Commission under Chapter XIX-A - Sections 234-B, 245-
0(2C) and s.245-0(6A) operate in different fields - Section 
234-B comes into operation when there is default in payment 
of advance tax whereas liability to pay interest u/s 245-0(2C) 
arises when the additional amount of income tax is not paid 
E 
ยท within time specified u/s 245-0(2A) - Section 245-0 (6A), on 
the other hand, imposes liability to pay interest only when the 
tax payable in pursuance of an order of Settlement 
Commission uls 245-0(4) is not made within the specified 
time.. 
ยท 
F 
s. 234-B - Terminal point for levy of interest in settlement 
of cases under Chapter XIX-A - Held: Would be up to the date 
of the Order u/s 245-0(1) and not up to the date of the Order 
of Settlement u/s 245-0(4). 
G 
ss. 154, 234-B, 245~0(4) and 245-1 - Rectification of 
mistake - Levy of interest'- Order of settlement uls 2450(4) 
to be conclusive - Held: In view of s. 245-1, the Settlement 
Commission cannot re-open its concluded proceedings by 
1167 
H 
1168 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2010] 11 S.C.R. 
~ invoking s. 154 so as to levy interest uls 234-8 - Section 154 
is not applicable to Chapter XIX proceedings. 
Pursuant to the referral orders dated 14.12.2004 and 
21.1.2005, the instant appeals were referred to the 
8 
Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. The questions 
for consideration before the Court were: (i) whether s. 
2348 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 would apply to 
proceedings of the Settlement Commission under 
Chapter XIX-A of the said Act? If yes; (ii) what would be 
C the terminal point for levy of such interest - whether such 
interest should be computed up to the date of the Order 
u/s 245-D (1) or up to the date of the Order of the 
Commission u/s 245-D (4)? and (iii) whether the 
Settlement Commission could reopen its concluded 
proceedings by invoking s. 154 of the said Act so as to 
D levy interest u/s 234-8, though it was not so done in the 
original proceedings? 
E 
Answering the reference and disposing of the 
appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1.1 Sections 234-A, 234-B and 234-C of the 
Income Tax Act 1961 are applicable to the proceedings 
of the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIX-A of the 
Act to the extent indicated in the judgment. (para 16] 
F [1220-D-E] 
1.2 Levy of interest is incidental to the liability and 
computation of advance tax. Liability and computation of 
advance tax is done under section C of Chapter XVII. On 
the other hand, interest for defaults in paymenLof 
G advance tax falls u/s 234-8, apart from ss.234-A and 234-
C, in section F of Chapter XVII. It is significant to note that 
s.234-A(4) refers to the increase or reduction of interest 
subsequent to the Order of the Commission u/s 245-0(4) 
increasing or reducing the amount of tax payable and so 
H also s.234-8(4). [para 9] (1207-A-C] 
BRIJ LAL & ORS. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 1169 
TAX, JALANDHAR 
1.3 Chapter XIX-A deals with Settlement of Cases. A 
The word "case" is defined u/s 245-A (b). It is an 
exhaustive definition, which makes it clear that an 
application for Settlement shall lie only when any 
proceedings for assessment or re-assessment or an 
appeal or revision in connection with such assessment s 
or re-assessment is pending before the Income Tax 
Authority. [para 10] [1207-H; 1208-A-B] 
1.4 An application for settlement made u/s 245-C(1) 
will not be maintainable without full and true disclosure 
of the income by the applicant, the manner in which such C 
undisclosed income was derived and that the applicant 
had furnished his return of income and that the additional 
tax payable on such income exceeds the specified 
amount. This was the position prior to Finance Act of 
2007. However, s.245-C(1A) inter a/ia provides that D 
additional amount of income tax payable in respect of the 
income disclosed shall be calculated in accordance with 
the provisions of s.245-C(1B). [para 10] [1208-8

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.