BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE versus JAYA I. SHAH AND ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE v. JAY A I. SHAH AND ANR. OCTOBER 17, 2003 B [V.N. KHARE, CJ. AND S.B. SINHA, J.] Stock Exchange Rules, Byelaws and Regulations, 1957: Defaulters' Committee-Status of-Held: Is not a juristic person but C merely an association of persons. Bye-Laws 322 and 326-Member Stock Exchange-Declared defaulter-Assets of-Vesting-Held: His assets vest in Defaulters' Committee for benefit and on account of creditor members-However, such D vesting is not absolute-Vestment co-terminus with the satisfaction of the members' claim-It comes to an end as soon as the purpose of Bye-law 326 is satisfied. Bye-Laws 248(a) and 282-Arbitration-Between members of Stock Exchange and between member and non-member-Distinction between- E Held: In the case of former, the award need not be filed in court and is an appealable one-Whereas in the case of latter, the award must be filed in court so as to make it enforceable. Rule 18 and Bye-Law 326--Claim of awardees-Satisfaction of....:._ F Held: Defaulters' Committee would not be a debtor in relation to awardees-The awardees entitled to get their claim on a pro rata basis and not in its entirety. Rule 16, Bye-Laws 326.and 343(7)-Defaulter member-Assets of- Method of distribution-To his creditors-Held: To be distributed on a pro G rata basis-However, claims to be determined subject to cut-off date prescribed by the Governing Board of the Exchange-But attachment of claims in the hands of defaulters' Committee not enforceable. A registered broker and a member of the appellant-Exchange was H declared a defaulter under byelaw No. 316 of the Stock Exchange 892 BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE v. J.I. SHAH 893 Rules, Byelaws and Regulations, 1957 whereupon he ceased A to be a member of the appellant-Exchange under Rule 53. The Defaulters' Committee constituted in terms of the Rules, Byelaws and Regulations took charge of his assets as were within the control of the appellant. The respondent had certain claims against the said regi~tered B broker. An arbitration award was made in her favour, which was made a rule of court, and a decre~ in terms thereof was prepared. In execution of the said decree, a warrant of attachment was issued for attaching the debt owed by the appellant-Exchange to the said registered C broker. A Garnishee Notice was also issued by the High Court calling upon the appellant to pay to the respondent a certain sum. The appellant filed several affidavits disclosing the amount lying in its hands. In the first affidavit, it was disclosed that sufficient fund was available to meet the claim of the respondent. However, in an D additional affidavit the appellant contended that the balance amount remaining out of the consideration received by exercising the right of nomination of the membership of the said registered broker i.e1 card money was required to be applied pro rata in accordance wit~ Rule 16(ii) and the said amount did not belong to and was not payable to E the respondent whether as a debt or otherwise, and was not held by the appellant-Exchange on behalf of the respondent. The appellant, therefore, contended that the respondent was not entitled to attach any part of the said amount. The Single Judge rejected the aforementioned contention of the appellant-Exchange and made the Garnishee Notice absolute pursuant whereto the appellant was directed to pay over to the respondent a certain sum. F The appellant filed an appeal before the Division Bench contending G that the Single Judge erred in rejecting and refusing to take on ~ecord the appellant's additional affidavit, which was dismissed. HenΒ’e the appeal. Disposing of the appeal, the Court H 894 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2003] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. A HELD : 1.1. The Defaulters' Committee constituted under Rule 170(a)(ii) of the Stock Exchange Rules, Byelaws and Regulations, 1957 is not a juristic person. It is merely an association of persons. (915-F] 1.2. The assets of a defaulter-member shall vest in the Defaulters' B Β· Committee under Byelaw 322 for the benefit and on account of the creditor members. However, such vesting is not absolute. The Default~rs' Committee is merely a trustee. [915-H, 916-B, 916-F) 1.3. The Defaulter's Committee takes in its custody the amount C realised from other assets not as an owner thereof and the vestment thereof would, thus, be co-terminns with the satisfaction of the claim of the member. It, as soon as the purpose of B
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex