BOMBAY STEAM NAVIGATION CO. (1953) PRIVATE LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
770 BOMBAY STEAM NAVIGATION CO. (1953) PRIVATE LID. A v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY October 21, 1964 (K. SUBBA RAO,_ J. c. SHAH ANDS. M. SlKRI JJ.) Income Tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), s. 10(2) (iii)-lntemt paid on unpaid balance of purchase price of assets acquired for a business-Whether such unpaid balance amounts to a loan-There/we whether interest allow- able as a deduc1ion on borrowed capi1a/--Or whether allowable as a deduc- tion under s. 10(2) (xv). · The assessec company was incorporaled with the object of taking over certain passenger and ferry services on lhe Konkan Coast. The assessee company purchased the assets required for its business fl'om the Scindia Steam Navigation Company and paid part of the consideration by allotting its own fully paid shares, leaving the balance unpaid. It was provided in the contract of purchase that interest at 6 per cent per annum would be paid to the Scindia Company on any unpaid balance until the whole of ii was fully paid. The Income Tax authorities disallowed the claim of the assessee com- pany in the computation of its profits and gains for deduclion of such inleresl paid to the Scindia Steam Navigation Company, and the Hiih Court affirmed that \iew. HELD : lnlerest paid by the assessee company was a permissible deduc- tion under s. 10(2) (xv). [779 F-0) B c D Per Shah and Sikri JJ.-By s. 10(2)(iii) only interest paid in respect of capital actually borrowed for the purpose of the business, profession or vocation, is a permissible allowance. An agreemeo[ to pay the balance of E consideration due by the purchaser does not give rise to a loan. Although a Joan of money undoubtedly results in a debt, every debt docs not involve a loan. Io this case the unpaid balance did not amount to capital borrow- ed and the interest paid thereon could not lherefore be allowed as a deduc- tion under s. 10(2)(iii). [774 H; 775 B-C; 776 C-DJ Metro Theatre Bombay Ltd. v. C./.T., (1946) 14 I.T.R. 638 and V. Ramaswami Ayyangar and another v. C.l.T., Madras, (1950) 18 l.T.R. F 150, referred to and approved. C.l.T., Madras v. S. Ramsay Ungar, (1947) 15 l.T.R. 87, distinguish- ed. Subba Rao J. reserved his opinion on the application of cl. (iii) of sub-5. (2) of s. 10 of the Indian Income·lax Act, 1922 to the claim for deduction of the interest paid. [771 BJ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeals Nos. 1023- 1024 of 1963. Appeals from the judgment and order dated August 9, 1962, of the Bombay High Court in Income-tax Reference No. 3 of 1961. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, T. A. Ramachandran, J. B. Dada- chanji, 0. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for the Appellant (in both the appeals). G H BOMBAY STEAM NAVIGATION CO; \I, C.I.T. (Shah J.) 771 A C. K. Daphtary, A1torney·General, K. N: Rajagopala Sastri, R; H. Dehbar and R. N. Sachthey, for the respondent (in bo!h the appeals)·. B The Judgment of J. C. Shah and S, M: Sikri· JJ1 was· delivered by Shah J. Suhba Rao J. I agree with the conclusion, but I would prefer not to express my view on the construction. of cl. (iii) of suh-s. (2) of s. 10 of the Indian Income-tu. Act, 1922 . . Shah J. The Bombay Steam Navigation Company Ltd. c whicli plied its passenger and ferry services on the Konkan coast and in the Bombay harbour was amalgamated with effect from June 30, 1952 with ·the Scindia Steam Navigation Company Ltd.-hereinafter called "the Scindias". The scheme of amalga- mation was sanctioned by the High Court of Bombay and the Scindias were authorised by the scheme· to float· and· establish a D joint stock company with the object of taking over the services on the Konkan coast and· in the Bombay haibour which were originally plied by the Bombay Steam Navigation Co; Ltd. Pur- suant to this authority the Bombay Steam Navigation· Co: ( 1953) Private Ltd.-hereinafter called· "the assessee Company" was in- corporated on August 10, 1953; The assessee Company con- E tracted wi~h the Scindias on August 12, 1953 to purchase·certain steamers, launches, boats, barges, buildings, flirniture, fiXtures · and've)iicles for a consideration provisionally estimated' at- Rs. 80 lakbs. It was provided by the agreement that the price of. the assets rold will b6 satisfied by allotmentto the Scindias of 29,900 F . shares credited as fully. paid-up of. the face value of Rs. U>tl each in the share capital. of the assessee Company; and'. the· balance will be treated by the· asscssee Company
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex