BIKRAM CHATTERJI & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 887 BIKRAM CHATTERJI & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. I.A. No.168186 of 2018, I.A. No. 109882 of 2020, I.A. No.114865 of 2020, I.A. No.153341 of 2019, I.A. No.120307 of 2020, I.A. No.123299 of 2020 And I.A. No. 6397 of 2021 (IN RE.: LA-RESIDENTIA PROJECT) In (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017) JUNE 29, 2021 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Housing: Residential project β Project to be developed by the Company concerned was widely advertised through brochures and advertisements as βAmrapali La Residentiaβ project, promising delivery of apartments within 36 months β Claim of flat buyers β Writ Petition filed in Supreme Court submitting that amounts invested by the apartment holders were siphoned away by the Amrapali Group of Companies β While entertaining the writ petitions, Supreme Court directed audit by forensic auditors β Observations of forensic auditor quoted with approval by Supreme Court in its Judgment dated 23.07.2019 β Another order dated 14.10.2019 subsequently passed by Supreme Court β Prayer in interim applications either seeking recall of Supreme Court orders dated 23.07.2019 and 14.10.2019 or revisit of the issue whether the Company ought to be declared as part of the Amrapali Group of Companies β Tenability β Held: Not tenable, more particularly because of the developments with respect to the instant project β Unlike all the other projects of the Amrapali Group which were made over to the NBCC, the development with respect to the instant project has always been an on-going process β Further, if the instant project is now handed over to the NBCC, it would result in escalation in costs to the detriment of the flat buyers β That apart, the interest of the Amrapali Group of Companies and consequently that of the flat buyers who had invested money in other Amrapali Projects already stood quantified at 19.75% by Orders dated 23.07.2019 and 14.10.2019 [2021] 6 S.C.R. 887 887 A B C D E F G H 888 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2021] 6 S.C.R. β Considering all the features of the matter, it would not be just and proper to hand over the development at this stage to the NBCC β It would not be appropriate to recall the orders dated 23.07.2019 and 14.10.2019 or to revisit the issue whether the Company could be declared to be part of the Amrapali Group of Companies β However, directions passed to secure the amounts receivable by Amrapali Group of Companies through the instant project β Applications under consideration accordingly disposed of. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: I.A. No.168186 of 2018, I.A. No. 109882 of 2020, I.A. No.114865 of 2020, I.A. No.153341 of 2019, I.A. No.120307 of 2020, I.A. No.123299 of 2020 And I.A. No. 6397 of 2021. (In Re.: La-residentia Project) In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017. (Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India) Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG., R. Venkataramani, Parag Tripathi, Joy Basu, Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Sr. Advs., Ravindra Kumar, M. L. Lahoty, Paban K Sharma, Anchit Sripat, Himanshu Shekhar, Mukul Singh, Vibhu Shankar Mishra, B. V. Balaram Das, Kanak Bose, Varun Sarin, Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Ashok Mathur, Raj Kamal, Maheen Pradhan, Aseem Atwal, Kartavya Batra, Avish Bhati, Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Puja Sharma, Kunal Sachdeva, Chowdhary Zulfar Ali, Ms. Garima Sharma, Ms. Vardhan Gupta, Paras Mithal, Parveen Kumar for M/S. Kings And Alliance LLP, MS. Sunita Yadav, Abhigya Kushwah, Siddharth Rajkumar Murarka, Pradeep Kumar Dubey, Ms. Anamika Kushwaha, Ms. Nandita Rao, Shashank Shekhar, Mrs. Mahija Reddy, K. N. Agnihotri, Virender Arora, Sanjay Kapur, Ms. Megha Karnwal, V M Kannan, Arjun Bhatia, Lalit Rajput, Yajur Bhalla, Vijay Kumar Diwedi, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Ashish Bajpayee, Deepak Samota, Shubham Bhalla, R. K. Awasthi, Prashant Kumar, Ms. Ritu Arora, Piyush Vatsa, Santosh Kumar-I, Vipul Ganda, Vishal Ganda, Satyajit A. Desai, Satya Kam Sharma, Saransh Kothari, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Pradhuman Gohil, Ms. Taruna Singh Gohil, Ashish Kabra, Mohammad Kamran, Ms. Ranu Purohit, Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Ms. Jasleen Bindra, Divyakant Lahoti, Parikshit Ahuja, Ms. Praveena Bisht, Ms. Madhur Jhavar, Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Kartik Lahoti, Ms. Shivangi Malhotra, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Amit Sinha, Subodh A B C D E F G H 889 Kr. Pathak, Sunil Rai, Ms. Richa Kapoor, Kunal Anand, Ms. Shalya Agarwal, Ms. Surabhi Katyal, Ms. Monoj V George, Ranjit Philip, Ms. Bhavika, Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Syed Mehdi Imam, Mohd Parvez Dabas, Uzmi Jameel Husain, Mohd. Aamir Dubas, Ms. Jasmine Damkewa
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex