LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BHUKAMP PIDIT ANDOLAN versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 36 · Decided: 08-05-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
BHUKAMP PIDIT ANDOLAN 
v. 
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. 
MAY 8, 1995 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
Natural Calamities-Earth 'quak,,_Victims-Compensati01t-Eligibility 
-Collector's report-Supreme Court directions for verification and payment 
of compensation. 
In this writ petition, the District Collector of Uttarkashi and Tehri 
Garwal have filed details regarding names received and considered, extent 
of verification done and who are the persons eligible to receive compensa· 
lion in the areas hit by earthquake. 
D 
Disposing the petition, this Court 
HELD : So far as Uttarkashi is concerned, there are no eligible 
earthquake victims left out. As regards Tehri District, 907 claims are pend· 
ing for verification. The District Collector is directed to have them verified 
within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of this order and 
E make payment to such of those who are found eligible. As to 576 persons 
whose claims were found to be eligible, but have not come forward to receive 
compensation, the District Collector is directed to issue notice to them 
within one month of receipt of this order and make payment after verifying 
that are genuine persons eligible to receive the compensation. [37 ·A, D & El 
F 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) No. 50 of 
1993. 
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). 
G 
K.G. Bhagat, Kamal Baid and Ms. K. Choudhary for the Petitioner. 
AK. Srivastava for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Affidavits have been filed on behalf of the District Collectors of 
H Uttarkashi and Tehri Garwal. As regards the claimants in Uttarkashi 
36 
• 
f· 
BHUKAMPPIDIT ANDOLAN v. STATEOFU.P. 
37 
District, it was ultimately found that only four persons are eligible. Claim A 
of 13 persons have been rejected on the ground either that Karla of the 
joint family has been paid and houses have already been rebuilt or claim 
have already been settled. Under these circumstances, so far as Uttarkashi 
is concerned, there are no eligible earthquake victims left out. 
With regard to the Tehri District, the Collector has given the details. B 
Names of 6978 have been received. Out of them they verified 6071. 907 are 
pending verification and compensation has already been received by 1500 
people. 3844 were found to be not eligible. 576 people though found 
eligible, have not come forward to receive compensation. Therefore, they 
have not been paid. 151 claimants were minor and, therefore, they are not C 
entitled to the payment of compensation. 
In view of these facts, we do not think that any further purpose will 
be served in keeping the matter pending since substantially required work 
has been done by the District Collector of Tehri. However, with regard to 
the pending 907 claims for verification, the District Collector is directed to D 
have them verified within a period of two months from the date of the 
receipt of this order and make payment to such of those who are found 
eligible. As to 576 persons whose claims were found to be eligible, the 
District Collector is directed to issue notice to them within one month of 
receipt of this order and make payment after verifying that they are genuine E 
persons eligible to receive the compensation. This verification may be got 
done in the presence of the patwari of the village concerned. 
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 
T.N.A. 
Petition disposed of.