LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BHASKAR MISHRA versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation: [2011] 9 S.C.R. 875 · Decided: 08-08-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: H.S. BEDI, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011] 9 S.C.R. 875 
BHASKAR MISHRA 
v. 
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 
(Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 5568 of 2011) 
AUGUST 8, 2011 
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] 
A 
B 
Bail - Repeated applications - Gross misuse of the 
process of the Court -
Case registered u/s.307 /PC -
Accused filed application for anticipatory bail uls.438 Cr.P. C. 
C 
before the Court of Sessions which was dismissed - High 
Court however granted anticipatory bail to the accused for a 
period of four weeks and also directed him to apply for regular 
bail in the meanwhile - Accused filed application in the Court 
of Sessions uls.439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail -
D 
Application dismissed - Accused again moved the High 
Court praying that the period of four weeks granted by the High 
Court for moving an application for regular bail be extended 
- High Court extended the time - Accused filed another 
application in the High Court u/s.438 rlw ss.439 and 482 of E 
Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail - Application dismissed by 
the High Court on the ground that the accused was not in 
custody - Accused filed yet another application for further 
extending the period of four weeks which too was dismissed 
- Accused thereupon filed SLP which was dismissed -
F 
Accused filed yet another application u/s. 438 CrPC before 
High Court - Application dismissed - Instant SLP against the 
said order -
Held: The accused-petitioner had been 
absconding and though he was shown great indulgence by 
the Sessions as we// as the High Court on several occasions, 
the directions issued by the courts were relentlessly flouted -
G 
The repeated applications were a gross misuse of the process 
of the court - SLP dismissed with direction that no further 
application for bail anticipatory or otherwise will be entertained 
875 
H 
876 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[20111 9 S.C.R. 
A by any Court until and unless the accused-petitioner 
deposited a sum of Rupees One Lac before the Court of 
Sessions as a pre-condition for the consideration of any bail 
application that he may choose to file - Code of Criminal 
Procedure, 1973 - ss.438 and 439. 
B 
c 
Siddharam Satlingapppa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 
and Others, 2011 (1) SCC 694: 2010 (15) SCR 201 -
referred to. 
Case Law Reference: 
2010 (15 ) SCR 201 
referred to 
Para 3 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: SLP (Crl.) No. 
5568 of 2011. 
o 
From the Judgment & Order dated 29.04.2011 of the High 
Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore in M. Cr. C. No. 
2171 of 2011. 
Vikas Upadhyay, Dr. Vipin Gupta for the Petitioner. 
E 
The following order of the Court was delivered 
F 
ORDER 
1. This Special Leave Petition is an example of the gross 
misuse of the process of the Court. The facts are as under: 
2.A case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was 
registered against the petitioner in Police Station MIG, Indore, 
Madhya Pradesh. Apprehending his arrest, he filed an 
application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. 
G on the 3rd of September 201 O before the Court of Sessions 
which was dismissed on the 7th September 2010. The 
petitioner thereupon filed a similar application before the 
Madhya Pradesh High Court and on the 24th September 2010 
the High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner for a 
H 
• 
-
BHASKAR MISHRA v. STATE OF MADHYA 
877 
PRADESH 
period of four weeks and also directed him to apply for regular 
A 
bail in the meanwhile. The petitioner accordingly filed an 
application dated 5th of October 2010 in the Court of Sessions, 
Indore under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular 
baii. The matter was listed on seven different dates between 
the 5th of October 2010 and the 1st of November 2010 and 
B 
except for one date (i.e. the 20th October 2010) the petitioner 
remained absent during the hearing of the bail application 
pleading sickness. The Sessions Judge finally dismissed the 
application on the 1st of November 2010. The petitioner agairi 
moved the High Court on the 26th October 2010 praying-that c 
the period of four weeks granted by the High Court for moving 
an application for regular bail be extended. The High Court vide 
its order dated 26th October 2010 extended the time up till 12th 
'November 2010. The petitioner instead of surrendering before 
the Sessions Court filed another application dated 8th 
D 
November 2010 in the High Court under Section 438 read with 
Sections 439 and 482 of the Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular 
bail. This appli

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.