LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BHARAT PETROLEUM (ERSTWHILE BURMAH SHELL) MANAGEMENT STAFF PENSIONERS. versus BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.

Citation: [1988] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 312 · Decided: 11-05-1988 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: RANGANATH MISRA · Disposal: Case Allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
BHARAT PETROLEUM (ERSTWHILE BURMAH SHELL) 
MANAGEMENT STAFF PENSIONERS. 
v. 
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LID. & ORS. 
MAY 11, 1988 
[RANGANATH MISRA AND MURARI MOHON DUTI, JJ.] 
Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act, 1976: 
ss. 3, 4, 9 & JO( 1)-Burmah Shell Management Staff Pensioliers-
Claim for escalation of pension-Admissibility of. 
Civil Services: Pension-No lunger considered a bounty-Held 
to be property-Entitlement to escalation of pension-Judicial notice 
can be taken of the fact that the rupee has lost its value. 
Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India 
D Limited bad a non-contributory pension fund. Consequent upon 
nationalisation of the petroleum industry, this fund was taken over by 
the Government company, respondent No. I, under s. 10(1) of the 
Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act 2 of 1976. 
In this writ petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution the erst-
E 
while Burmah Shell Management Staff Pensioners claimed adequate 
escalation in their pension keeping in view the loss of purchasing power 
of the rupee and the general rise in the cost of living. In support of their 
claim they relied upon the steep escalation in the pension granted by the 
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, a sister concern, to its employees. 
The latter bas no such fund. It was contended for the respondent-
i F 
Company that if the escalation admitted by the Hindustan Petroleum 
Corporation is accepted as the basis for escalation in the respondent 
company there would be injustice or a burden would arise which they 
cannot discharge. 
G 
Allowing the writ petition, 
HELD: 1. The petitioners being the management staff of the 
Burmah Shell are entitled to a hike in the pension. [316E-F] 
2. Judicial notice can be taken of the fact that the rupee has Jost 
its value to a considerable extent. Pension is no longer considered as a 
H bounty and it has been held to be property. ln a welfare state, as ours, 
312 
.BHARAT PETil.OLEUM STAFF v. BHARAT PE1ROLEUM CORPN. [MISRA. J. [ 313 
rise in the pension of the retired personnel, who are otherwise entitled 
to it, is accepted by the State and the State has taken the liability. In 
the instant case, if the similarly situated sister concern like Hindus-
tan Petroleum Corporation can admit appropriate rise in the pension, 
there is no justification as to why the respondent company should not do 
so. [316D-E] 
3. The respondent-company has an obligation to pay from its 
earnin~ into the fond and merely because the existing fund is not 
adequate to bear the additional liability the claim which is othern'ise 
justified cannot be rejected. The company's current funds are available 
to supplement the pension fund. [3!6C] 
4. Respondent No. l to give to the petitioners hike in the pension 
effective from Isl May, 1988 at the same rate as is being given by 
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation. If the amount available from the 
pension fund is not adequate the Government-company would allocate 
appropriate funds to meet the demand. The additional pension to be 
disbursed latest by 31st of July, 1988. [316F-G] 
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 590 of 
1987. 
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) 
B.B. Sawhney for the Petitioners. 
G.B. Pai, 0.C. Mathur, Ms. Meera Mathur, Ms. Deepa 
Chhabra and D.N. Misra for the Respondents. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
RANGANATH MISRA, J. Under the Burmah Shell {Acquisition 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
of Undertakings in India) Act 2 of 1976, (hereinafter referred to as the 
'Act'), the Union of India acquired the right, title and interest of 
Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Limited 
(hereinafter referred to as Burmah Shell) in relation to its under-
G 
takings in India. Sections 3, 4, and 9 of the Act are relevant. Under 
section 3 the right, title and interest of Burrnah Shell in relation to its 
undertakings in India stood transferred and became vested in the 
Central Government. In terms of section 4, the assets and liabilities 
were taken over by the Government of India. Under section 9 persons 
employed under Burmah Shell came under the employment of the H 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
314 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
I 1988] Supp. I S.C.R. 
Government Company known as Bharat Petrolium Corporation 
Limited (respondent No. l herein). Section IO( I) provides thus: 
"Where a provident, superannuation, welfare or 
other fund has been established by Buimah Shell fo

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.