LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. versus MUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGHA AND ORS .

Citation: [2001] 3 S.C.R. 208 · Decided: 25-04-2001 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.P. BHARUCHA, V.N. KHARE, N. SANTOSH HEGDE, Y.K. SABHARWAL, SHIVARAJ V. PATIL · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Cited by 3 judgment(s) · cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. 
v. 
MUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGHA AND ORS . 
.... 
APRIL 25, 2001 
B 
[S.P. BHARUCHA, V.N. KHARE, N. SANTOSH HEGDE, Y.K. 
SABHARWAL AND SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, JJ.] 
Judicial discipline-Judgment given by a Constitution Bench*-Bench 
of two Judges doubted the correctness of judgment ·of Constitution Bench-
C Consequential reference-Held-Decision· of Constitution Bench binds a 
Bench of two Judges-Judicial discipline obliges them to follow it-
Accordingly matter should be heard and decided by a Bench of two Judges. 
*Gammon (India) Ltd. v. Union of India, [1974] 3 SCR 665, referred 
D to. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6213 of 
1997. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 30/31.1.97 and 21.2.97 of the Bombay 
E 
High Court in W.P. No. 436of1991. 
F 
T.R. Andharujina, P.N. Misra, P.H. Parekh, Sameer Parekh, Birender 
Saraf, Ms. Indoo P. Verma, Colin Gonsalves, Bharat Sangal, Ms. Aparna Bhat, 
Ms. Asha Pathak, Biswajit S., C.K. Ganguli, Brij Bhushan, K.C. Kaushik and 
C. Radhakrishna for Arvind Kr. Sharma for the appearing parties. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
ORDER 
The order of reference to a Constitution Bench is dated 13th January, 
G 1998. Two learned judges of this Court have doubted the correctness of the 
scope attributed to Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and 
Abolition) Act, 1970 in the Constitution Bench judgment in Gammon (India) 
Ltd. v. Union of India, [1974] 3 SCR 665. This is how the matter comes before 
us. 
H 
We are of the view that a decision of a Constitution Bench of this Court 
208 
<. 
-
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. v. MUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGHA 209 
binds a bench of two learned judges of this Court and that judicial discipline A 
obliges them to follow it, regardless of their doubts about its correctness. At 
the most, they could have ordered that the matter be heard by a Bench of 
three learned judges. 
Accordingly, this matter shall now be heard and decided by a Bench of 
two learned judges. 
B 
T.N.A. 
Matter is still pending. 
e