BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. (BPCL) & ORS versus NISAR AHMED GANAI & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 360 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 17 S.C.R. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. (BPCL) & ORS. v. NISAR AHMED GANAI & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6781-6783 of 2022) OCTOBER 12, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Applicability of – Land in question was sought to be acquired under the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 – Landowners filed the writ petition before the High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 – During the pendency of the writ petition, the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 came to be repealed – Original writ petitioners-landowners submitted that neither the possession of the land in question nor the award has been declared under the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 – Thus, the landowners will be entitled to compensation of acquired land in accordance with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – High Court allowed the writ petitions and directed to determine the compensation of the acquired lands in accordance with the s.24 (1) of the Act of 2013 – Appellants submitted before the Supreme Court, that the High Court has erred and in view of Clause 2(13) of the J&K Reorganisation (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 read with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, the rights, privileges, obligations or liabilities acquired, accrued or incurred under any law so repealed and that any investigation, legal proceedings or remedy may be instituted, continued and enforced as if J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 has not been passed – Section 24(1) of the Act of 2013 will not be applicable – Held: Section 24(1) of the Act, 2013 speaks about the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and in the present case, the land in question have been acquired as per the provision provided under the J&K Land Acquisition Act, 1990 – The case of the landowners that as the provisions of the J&K State Act of 1990 are pari materia to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 , the provisions under Section 24(1) of the Act of 2013 will be applicable, cannot [2022] 17 S.C.R. 360 360 A B C D E F G H 361 be accepted – The language of Section 24 of the Act of 2013 is very clear and unambiguous and it talks about the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 only and does not speak about any other pari materia provision of different statutes – High Court has committed a serious error in directing to pay compensation under the Act of 2013 – Therefore, the impugned common judgment and order of the High Court is quashed – Accordingly, all the writ petitions are remitted back to the High Court to decide in accordance with the law and on its own merit – However, the issue with respect to the applicability of the Act of 2013 is concluded. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. On fair reading of Section 24(1)(a) of the Act, 2013, it provides that notwithstanding anything contained in Act, 2013, in any case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where no award under Section 11 of the said Land Acquisition Act has been made, then, all provisions of Act, 2013 relating to the determination of the compensation shall apply. Section 24(1) of the Act, 2013 speaks about the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In the present case, the lands in question have been acquired under the provisions of the State Land Acquisition Act, 1990. Therefore, the acquisition of the lands in question is not under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It cannot be disputed that prior to the enactment of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019 and promulgation of the Jammu & Kashmir (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was not applicable at all so as far as the State of Jammu & Kashmir is concerned. It is only on the enactment of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019, Act, 2013 shall be made applicable. It is the case on behalf of the original writ petitioners that as the provisions of the State Act of 1990 are pari materia to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and therefore, Section 24(1)(a) of the Act, 2013 shall be applicable. The aforesaid cannot be accepted. The language of Section 24(1)(a) of the Act, 2013 is very clear and unambiguous. It talks about the land acquisition under the provisions of the La
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex