LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

BHANU VALVE versus STATE

Citation: [2011] 5 S.C.R. 769 · Decided: 18-04-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011) 5 S.C.R. 769 
BHANU VALVE 
v. 
STATE 
(Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3192 of 2011) 
APRIL 18, 2011 
[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] 
" 
A 
8 
Penal Code, 1860 - s. ยท376 - Accused raped his own 
daughter regularly for five years after his wife left him, and 
fathered a child from his daughter - Conviction by courts 
C 
below - On appeal, held: There is no reason to disbelieve the 
evidence of the daughter as also the courts. below - The act 
of the accused was most 'barbaric and heinous, and cannot 
be condoned by any means - Thus, order passed by the 
courts below upheld. 
D 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : SLP (Criminal) 
No. 3192 of 2011. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.07.2010 of the 
High Court of Bombay at Goa in Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 
E 
2009. 
Garvesh Kabra for the Petitioner. 
The following order of the Court was delivered 
ORDER 
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 
Delay condoned. 
This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment 
of the Barnaby High Court dated 27.07.2010 by which the High 
Court has upheld the conviction of the petitioner by the trial 
court. 
769 
F 
G 
H 
770 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2011) 5 S.C.R. 
A 
The facts in detail have been set out in the impugned 
B 
judgment, and hence we are not repeating the same here. The 
High Court and the trial court have discussed the evidence in 
great detail, and we entirely agree with the view they have 
taken. 
This is one of the most barbaric and heinous cases we 
have come across in our judicial career. The petitioner has 
been found guilty of raping his own daughter regularly for five 
years after his wife left him, and has produced a child from her. 
C This kind of unheard behaviour cannot be condoned by any 
means. The daughter-PW-1 (prosecutrix) has given her 
evidence in this case, and we see no reason to disbelieve her. 
The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly. 
N.J. 
Special Leave Petition dismissed.