LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

BASANT ROADWAYS versus STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS.

Citation: [1986] 3 S.C.R. 1002 · Decided: 30-09-1986 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
BASANT ROADWAYS 
v. 
STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS. 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 
[E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND G.L OZA, JJ.] 
Constitution of India, Art. 136--lnterim orders of High Court-
No Interference in Special Leave Petitions. 
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, s. 57-Practice of granting of tem-
porary permits repeatedly to ply stage carriages deprecated. 
In a petition for special leave against an interim order of the High 
Co,nrt, 
HELD: (1) As the special leave petition is filed against an interim 
order of the High Court, this Court does not propose to interfere. I 1003B] 
(2-1) The practice of granting of temporary permits repeatedly to 
E 
ply stage carriages for short periods even when it is made out that there 
is a grave need for increasing the number of regular services on the 
;_ 
routes in question in the public interest is deprecated. In many cases 
this practice has led to undesirable results. I I003B-C] 
(2.2) The proper action to be taken by the Regional Transport 
F _ Authorities in such cases is to grant regular permits in accordance with 
law either by inviting applications for grant of permits or ,on the appli-
-1 
cations made by intending operators suo motu under s. 57(2) of the 
" 
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. I 1003C-D] 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition 
G 
(Civil) No. 11638 of 1986 
From the Judgment and Order dated 12th September, 1986 of 
the Mad\lya Pradesh High Court in M.P. No. 2845of1986. 
B.K. Rawat, M.K. Dua, Aman Vachher and S.K. Mehta for the 
H 
P.etitioners. 
1002 
~--
-
'1' 
BASANf ROADWAYS v. STATE TRANSPORT 
1003 
The following Order of Court was delivered 
ORDER 
Since this petition is filed against an' interim order we do not 
propose to interfere with the order of the High Court. The Petition is 
dismissed. 
We, however, deprecate the practice of granting of temperory 
permits repeatedly to ply st&ge carriages for short periods even when it 
is made out that there is a grave need for increasing the number of 
regular services .on the routes in question in public interest. In many 
cases 'this practice has led to undesirable results. In all such cases the 
proper action to be taken. by the Regional Transport Authorities is to 
grant regular permits in accordance with law either by inviting applica-
tions for grant of permits or on the applications made by intending 
operators suo motu under section 57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 
1939. We hope that the Regional Transport Authorities will take 
necessary steps in accordance with law in respect of all the routes to 
alleviate the suffering of the travelling public. 
M.L.A. 
Petition dismissed. 
A 
B 
c 
Dยท 
E