BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
-- ·, -.... • 67 A . BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA • v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS· December.16, 1983 B Constiflltio11 of India.-Article 32 (1)-Mode of intirpreting Article 3Z.....- "Appropriate proceedings", 1neaning of-Letter addressed· by a party on behalf of pers_ons belonging to socially and, economically weaker iRections co1n'p/aining violation ... • of their rights under vario~ts social welfare legislations-Whether can be t'reated as a writ petition._Maint~iltability of-Public ·Interest Litigation-Nature and scope of. . C • Constitution of India, Article 32 (2)-Appointmeftt of com1nissions _by ihe Supretn'! Court to enqui;e into the complaint made iii the writ petition anti rrlying upon the commi~sioners' re/,ort-Prop~iety of-Adver:;arial Procedure-How far binding on the Co.urt-Supreme Court Rules, 1966, O, ·xxxv, XLVI and XLVll, Rule 6- Code of Civil Procedure,.O,XXVI. · Mines Act, ·1952-Sections 2 (j), (jj), (kk), .i (I) (b) proviso 18 Chapters V, VI &. Vil-Meaning of the word ''mine"--Whether stone quarries are 1n;ties-Whether workers of the stone quarries and crushers entitled to the benefits accruing under" the Act-Responsibility of the mine lessees, 1nine owners, Ceniral Governmint and the State ·Governments for ensuring the benefits accruing under the Act, explained-Mines Rules 1955, Rules 30-32-r'uniab Minor Minera~ Concession Rules, 1964. Inter-State Migra~t Work1nen (Regulation of .Employment and Conditions of Service) Act. 1979-ss.2 (/) (e), (b), (g), 4,§_)2 and Chapter V-Inter·State Mig- rant Workmen (Regulation of Employment aird Conditions of SerJ1ice) Central Rules, : 1980-Rules 23, 25-45-Definition of inter-state 1nigrant workinen-Rights and benefits of inter-state mlgrant workmen ·explalned~Thekedars or Jan1adars recruitlng workers for· mine lessees/owners from outside the State are "contractOrs"-Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, J.970-:-ss. 2 (/)(a), (b), (c) (g), 16 to 21. . . Bonded IAbour Sys(em (Abolition) Act, 1976-ss.2 (f), (g), 4, 5, 10-15-Exis- tene,!! of Forced Labour-Whether bonded.labour-Burden o} prooJ lies upon the em- ployer that the labourer is not a bonded labourer-Court will be justified in pressum- ing thilt the labourer ls a bonded labourer unless the pfesumption is rebutted by . producing satisfactory mai~rial. Minbnum Wciges Act, Worktnen's C0mpensation 1Act, 1983,Paynient of Wages Act, ·E1npl0Yees State Insurance Act, Emplqyees Provident Fund and MisCel/aneous Provisions Act, Maternity Benefits Act, 1957-Benefits accruing under these Acts- Whether available to mine workers. - D E F G The petitioner, an organisation dedicated to the cause of release of bonded . labourers in the country, addressed ·a Ieiter to Hon'ble Bbagwati, J. alleging : (1) H that there \Vere a large number of labourers from different parts ofthC: Country who wC:re work.1ng in some of the stone quarries situate in district Faridabad, State of . ' . ' A .B c D E F G H • , 68 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [!982] 2 S.c.R. Haryana under 0 inhuman and intolerable cohditions; (2) that a large number of them were bonded labollrcrs; (3) that the provision·s of the Constitution and ·various social Weffare laws passed for the benefit of the ~aid workmen ~ere not be:- ing implemented in regard to these IabOurers .. Th~ petitioner also mentioned in the letter the names of the stone. quarries and particulars of labourers who were work~ ing a_s bonded labourers and prayed that a w.t;it be issued for Proper implementation of the yarious provisiOni .of . the.., soda! welfare legislations, s:4ch as,· Min~s Act, 1952 Inter-State ~11grant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Con.:. ditiofls of Service) Act, 1979, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, Minimum Wages.Act, Work- men's Compensation Act, Payment of Wages Act, Employees State Insurance Act, · Ma.tern'ity ~enefits Act et~. applicable t~ these'Iabour~rs Wo.rking in the said ,sto-ne quarries with a view to endiIJ,$ the misery, suffering, and helplessness of "these vic- tims of t~e inost inhllinan exploitation." · The Coui't treated the letter as· a writ petition and appointed a commissi;>n to inqui.re ·into· the allegations made by the petitioner. The conunission while cori- , firming the allegatic;>ns of the petitioner, pointed out i~ its ref)ort that-(i) the v,.hole atmosphere in the alleged stone quarries was fuil of dust and i
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex