LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

BALDEV SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

Citation: [2015] 12 S.C.R. 969 · Decided: 04-11-2015 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.S. KHEHAR · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Cited by 3 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

(2015] 12 S.C.R. 969 
BALDEV SINGH 
v. 
STATE OF HARYANA 
(Criminal Appeal No. 167of2015) 
November 04, 2015 
[JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ] 
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 
A 
B 
- s. 15 - Punishment for contravention in relation to poppy c 
straw-Appellant-tractor driver found in possession of poppy 
husk - Order of acquittal by Sessions Judge since no other 
witness except ASl-PW-1 was examined and his evidence 
was not trustworthy - However, High Court set aside the 
acquittal and convicted the appellant u/s. 15 and sentenced 0 
to rigorous imprisonment for twelve years- On appeal, held: ยท 
Evidence of police witnesses cannot be discarded merely 
on the ground that it is not supported by independent evidence 
or they belong to police force and are interested in the 
investigation - Mere fact that they are police officials does 
E 
not by itself give rise to any doubt about their creditworthiness 
-
Testimony of PW-1 and evidence on record amply 
establishes physical possession of the contraband by the 
appellant- SI who investigated the case was not examined 
by the prosecution in spite of several opportunities - Since 
F 
PW-1 was a part of the police party and PW-1 had signed in 
all recovery memos, non-examination of SI could not have 
caused any prejudice to the accused nor does it affect the 
credib'ility of the prosecution version - From the evidence 
Q 
led by prosecution, its proved beyond reasonable doubt that 
the accused being the driver of the tractor was in conscious 
possession of the thirty three bags of poppy husk in the trolley 
attached to the tractor- Upon appreciation of evidence, High 
Court rightly reversed the acquittal and convicted the H 
969 
970 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2015] 12 S.C.R. 
A appellant uls. 15 - However, the sentence of imprisonment 
reduced from twelve years to ten years since appellant 
suffered a protracted proceeding of about twenty five years. 
Gyan Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P 1995 Supp (4) SCC 
B 658; Girja Prasad (dead) by LRs. vs. State ofM.P. AIR 2007 
SCW 5589:(2007) 7 SCC 625; Abdul Rashid Ibrahim 
Mansuri vs. State of Gujarat AIR 2000 SC 821 - referred to. 
c 
D 
Case Law Reference 
1995 Supp (4) SCC 658 
Referred to 
(2007) 1 sec 625 
AIR 2000 SC 821 
Referred to 
Referred to 
Para 9 
Para 11 
Para 13 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal 
No. 167 of2015. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 29.05.2003 of the High 
E Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal 
No. 39-DBA of 1995. 
Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr.Adv., Pratham Sethi,Amandeep 
Mehra, Daya Krishan Sharma, Advs., with him, for Appellant. 
' 
F 
Amit Kumar, AAG, Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv., with him, for 
Respondent. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
G 
R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is the 
ยท judgment dated 29.05.2003 passed by the High Court of 
Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.39-DBA of 1995, 
wherein the High Court reversed the judgment of acquittal 
passed by the Sessions Judge, Sirsa and convicted the 
H appellant under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and 
BALDEV SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA 
971 
[R. BANUMATHI, J.] 
Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (NDPSAct) on account of A 
having been found in possession of poppy husk and sentenced 
him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for twelve years and to 
pay a fine of Rs.1,50,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous 
imprisonment for six months. 
B 
2. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that on 16/ 
17.09.1990 mid night at about 12.15 a.m., Chander Singh-SI 
alongwith Ram Singh-AS I and team of police personnel with 
Government Jeep No. HNN 3108 and a private jeep were 
holding Nakabandi on both sides of Kacha path leading to 
C 
village Kingre from G.T. Road for detection of the contraband. 
At that time, a tractor No.RJV 6299 with trolley was heading 
towards the road from the village and the same was stopped 
and the appellant was apprehended and-he was inquired about D 
the gunny bags of poppy husk lying in the trolley. The appellant 
was served with a written notice to the effect that as to whether 
he wanted to be examined before First Class Magistrate or 
Gazetted Officer in connection with the recovery of poppy husk 
from his trolley. The appellant had shown faith in Sub Inspector-
E 
Chander Singh and as per rules Sub-Inspector searched the 
trolley. Thirty three yellow coloured gunny bags containing poppy 
husk were recovered from the trolley attached

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.