LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

AVINASH MEHROTRA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2009] 5 S.C.R. 913 · Decided: 13-04-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: DALVEER BHANDARI · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

~-i 
[2009] 5 S.C.R. 913 
AVINASH MEHROTRA 
A 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
;. 
(Writ Petition (c) No. 483 of 2004) 
) 
APRIL 13, 2009 
B 
[DALVEER BHANDARI AND LOKESHWAR SINGH 
PANTA, JJ.] 
CONSTITUTION OF /NOIA, 1950: 
c 
Articles 21, 21-A, 51-A(K) - Right to receive education 
free from fear of security and safety -
Held: Is the 
fundamental right of each and every child - Right to 
;. 
education incorporates the provision of safe schools -
Articles 21 and 21-A require that children are provided D 
education in safe schools - State Governments and Union 
Territories directed to ensure that schools adhere to basic 
safety standards and school buildings are safe and secured 
according to the safety norms prescribed by the National 
Building Code - Affidavits of compliance to be filed by E 
authorities concerned - Public Interest Litigation - National 
Building Code of India, 2005 - Part IV - Fire and Life Safety 
in Educational Institutions. 
ยทยท~ 
In a thatched-roof school building, which housed 900 
students, a fire broke out in which 93 children were burnt F 
alive and several others got injured. The said building 
had a single entrance and exit, a narrow stairway and 
windowless classrooms. The instant writ petition was 
filed under Public Interest Litigation in order to protect 
school children against similar future tragedies and to G 
'--'\ 
improve the conditions of the schools in the country. The 
Court issued notices to the Union of India, State 
Governments and the Union Territories. Twenty seven 
States and Union Territories filed affidavits admitting that 
913 
H 
914 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009] 5 S.C.R. 
)' 4 
A many schools did not meet even the self-determined 
safety standards which itself were far below in standards 
of the National Building Code of India, 2005. 
Directh1g the petition to be listed again, the Court 
โ€ข 
B 
HELD: 1.1. In the years since the inclusion of Article 
~ 
21A in the Constitution of India, the Court has clarified 
that the right to education attaches to the individual as 
an inalienable human right. Education remains essential 
to the life of the individual, as much as health and dignity, 
c and the St.ate must provide it, comprehensively and 
completely, in order to satisfy its highest duty to citizens. 
[Para 26] [927-0-G] 
Unni Krishnan, J.P. & Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh 
& Ors. (1993) 1 SCC 645, R.D. Upadhyay v. State of A.P. & 
~ ' 
D Ors. AIR 2006 SC 1946, Election Commission of India Vs. 
St. Mary's School & Ors. (2008) 2 SCC 390 and Bandhua 
Mukti Morcha V. Union of India & Ors., (1997) 10 SCC 549, 
relied on. 
E 
1.2. Unlike other fundamental rights, the right to 
education places a burden not only on the State (Article 
21-A), but also on the parent or guardian of every child, 
and on the child herself (Article 51-A(k). The Constitution 
directs both burdens to achieve one end: the compulsory 
F education of children, free from the fetters of cost, 
f 
parental obstruction, or State inaction. The two articles 
also balance the relative burdens on parents and the 
State. Parents sacrifice for the education of their children, 
by sending them to school for hours of the day, but only 
G with a commensurate sacrifice of the State's resources. 
The right to education, then, is more than a human or 
fundamental right. It is a reciprocal agreement between 
r-ยท 
the State and the family, and it places an affirmative 
burden on all participants in our civil society. [Paras 27 
โ€ข 
H and 29] [927-H; 928-A, 0-E] 
-
J 
AVINASH MEHROTRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 915 
2.1. The right to education incorporates the provision A 
of safe schools. It is the fundamental right of each and 
every child to receive education free from fear of security 
and safety. The children cannot be compelled to receive 
education in an unsound and unsafe building. Articles 21 
and 21-A of the Constitution require that India's children 
B 
receive education in safe schools. In order to given effect 
to the provisions of the Constitution, it must be ensured 
that schools in the country adhere to basic safety 
standards without further delay. [Para 32, 38 and 39] [929-
E; 935-D-F] 
C ยท 
2.2. In view of the importance of Article 21A, it is 
imperative that the education which is provided to 
children in the primary schools should be in the 
environment of safety. Educating a child requires more 
than a teacher and a blackboard, or a classroom and a D 
book. The right to education requires that a child

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.