AVEEK SARKAR & ANR. versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2014] 2 S.C.R. 263 AVEEK SARKAR & ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 902 of 2004) FEBRUARY 03, 2014 [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] A B CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s.482 - Quashing of proceedings - German magazine published an article with a picture of world renowned Tennis player, posing C nude and covering the breast of his dark-skinned fiancee with his hands which was photographed by none other than her father - The couple spoke against apartheid and proclaimed that true love has no boundaries - The article reproduced in Indian magazine and newspaper - Criminal proceedings o under ss. 292, /PC and ulss. 3, 4 and 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 against the editor and publisher of magazine and newspaper - High Court declining to quash the proceedings - On appeal, Held: While judging as to whether a particular photograph, an article or E book is obscene, regard must be had to the contemporary values and national standards and not the standard of a group of susceptible or sensitive persons - Hicklin test is not the correct test to be applied to determine ''what is obscenity" - Those sex-related materials which have a tendency of F "exciting lustful thoughts" can be held to be obscene, however, obscenity has to be judged from the point of view of an average person, by applying contemporary community standards - The said picture has to be viewed in the background in which it was shown, and the message it has to convey to the public and the world at large - The message it G conveyed was eradicate evil of racism and apartheid in the society and promote love and marriage between white skinned man and a black skinned woman - When viewed in 263 H 264 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 2 S.C.R. A that angle, the picture or the article cannot be said to be objectionable so as to initiate proceedings u/s. 292 /PC or ul s.4 of the Act, 1986 - Magistrate, without appreciation of background in which the photograph was shown, proposed to initiate prosecution proceedings against the appellants - High 8 Court should have exercised powers uls. 482 to secure the ends of justice - Criminal proceedings initiated against the appellants set aside - Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - ss.3, 4, 6 - Penal Code, 1860 - s.292. A German magazine published an article with a C picture of world renowned Tenn.is player (Boris), posing nude and covering the breast of his dark-skinned fiancee (Barbara) with his hands which was photographed by none other than her father. The couple spoke freely against apartheid and proclaimed that true love has no D boundaries. The article stated that the purpose of the photograph was also to signify that love champions over hatred. The article was reproduced in "Sports World", a widely circulated magazine published in India and then in Anandabazar Patrika, a newspaper having wide E circulation in Kolkata. A Kolkata lawyer filed a complaint under Section 292, IPC before the Magistrate against the appellants, the Editor and the Publisher and Printer of the newspaper as F well as against the Editor of the Sports' World. The complaint stated that theΒ· nude photograph would have effect to corrupting young minds, both children and youth of this country, and was against the cultural and moral values of our society and that unless such types of obscene photographs are censured and banned and G accused persons are punished, the dignity and honour of our womanhood would be in jeopardy. The complainant also urged that the accused persons should not only be prosecuted under Section 292 IPC, but also be prosecuted under Section 4 of theΒ· Indecent H AVEEK SARKAR & ANR. v. STATE OF WEST 265 BENGAL & ORS. Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, since A the photograph prima facie gives a sexual titillation and its impact is moral degradation and would also encourage the people to commit sexual offences. The Magistrate held that a prima facie case was made out against the accuse'd persons under Section 292 IPC and issued B summons against all the accused persons. The accused persons on 5.3.1993 filed an application before the Court for dropping the proceedings stating that there was no illegality in reproducing news item in the C Sports World as well as in the Anandabazar Patrika and photograph appeared in a magazine 'STERN" published in Germany. Fu
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex