LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDED PRIVATE MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE & ANR. NTAL COLLEGE & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2) (FOR DIRECTIONS)

Citation: [2016] 3 S.C.R. 542 · Decided: 09-05-2016 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ANIL R. DAVE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2016] 3 S.C.R. 542 
A 
ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDED PRIVATE 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE & ANR. 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
(Interlocutory Application No. 2) 
(For directions) 
Ill 
(Transfer Case (C) No.(s).7 of2013 etc.) 
MAY9, 2016 
[ANIL R. DAVE, SHIVA KIRT! SINGH AND ADARSH 
KUMAR GOEL, JJ]. 
Education/Educational Institutions - Admission for MBBSI 
BDS course - Notification dated 21.12.2010 introducing National 
Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEETJ - For admission to MBBSIBDS 
courses - Notification struck down in Christian Medical College 
case~ However, that order recalled by order dated 11.4.2016 -
Writ.petition No. 26112016 filed seeking direction to conduct NEET 
for the academic session 2016-17 - Assurance by the parties 
concerned that NEET would be conducted for the academic session 
2016-17 giving schedule for the same - Court by order dated 
28.4.2016 directed to hold the NEET as assured - Present 
applications seeking modification of the orders dated 11.4.2016 
and 28.4.2016 - Held: There is no infirmity in NEET regulation on 
the ground that it affects the rights of the States or the private 
institutions as the same provides only for conducting entrance test 
for eligibility for admission - It is further directed that all such 
eligible candidates who could not appear in NEET-I and those who 
had appeared but have apprehension that they had not prepared 
well, be permitted to appear in NEET-Jl, subject to seeking an option 
from the candidates to give up their candidature for NEET-1 - All 
the applications and writ petitions disposed of. 
Modern Dental College & Ors. v. State of MP. & Ors. 
2016(4) JT 476 - relied on. 
Christian Medical College, Vellore v. Union of India 
H 
2013 (7) SCR 908 = 2014 (2) SCC 305 - referred to. 
542 
ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDED PRIVATE MEDICAL& 
543 
DENTAL COLLEGE &ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA& ORS. 
Case Law Reference 
2013 (7) SCR 908 
2016(4) JT 476 
referred to 
relied on 
para 4 
para 7 
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Interlocutory Application 
A 
No. 2 in Transfer Case (C) No. 7 of 2013 
B 
WITH 
Interlocutory Application No. 3 in Transfer Case (C) No(s). 58 of 
2013 
Interlocutory Application Nos.4-6 in Transfer Case (C) No(s). 
132-134of2012 
Interlocutory Application No. I 0 in Transfer Case (C) No(s). 98 
of2012 
Interlocutory Application No. 2 in Transfer Case (C) No(s). 99 of 
2012 
Writ Petition (C) No. 275 of2016 
Interlocutory Application No. I in Transfer Case (C) No(S). 11 of 
2013 
c 
D 
Interlocutory Application Nos. 2 to 30 in Writ petition (C) No(s). 
E 
26lof2016 
Writ Petition (C) No. 292of2016 & Writ petition (C) No. 293 of 
2016. 
Ranjit Kumar, SG, Ms. Pinky Anand, Tushar Mehta, ASGs, Vikas 
Singh, Soli J. Sorabjee, P.P. Rao, V. Giri, S. Prasad, K.K. Venugopal, K. 
Shashikiran Shetty, Gopal Subramanium, P.H. Parekh, Basava Prabhu 
Patil, Jayant Bhushan, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, H.P. Raval, A.K. Ganguli, 
Ravindra Srivastava,Ajit Kumar Sinha, S. Ganesh, Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha 
Pillay, Huzefa Ahmadi, J.C. Gupta, Mukul Talwar, Sr. Advs. J. 
Ramachandra Rao, AAG, A. Mariarputham, Madhusudan Naik, A.N.S. 
Nadkarni, Vikramjeet Banerjee, A Gs, Ms. Rekha Pandey, R.K. Rathore, 
M.P. Gupta, R.S. Nagar, Ms. Binu Tamta, S.S. Rawat, R.R. Rajesh, 
Prabal Bagchi, Akash Jindal, Rishabh Jain, (For D.S. Mahra), Ms. H. 
Wahi, Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Prateek Bhatia, Dhawal 
Mohan, Ms. Deepeika Kalia, Kapish Seth, Ms. Vara Gaur, Tara Chandra 
Sharma, Ajay Sharma, Rupesh Kumar, Rajeev Sharma, Ms. Neelam 
F 
G 
H 
544 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2016] 3 S.C.R. 
Sharma, Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, V. Balaji, M.S.M. Asaithambi, Atul 
Sharma, C. Kannan, Ms. Sripradha Krishnan, B. Balaji, G. Pramod 
Kumar, Vijay Kumar Paradeshi, Ms. Fara Fathima, Ramesh Babu M.R., 
E.R. Kumar, Krishna Srinivasan, Ms. Geethi A., Abhinay, Ms. S. Lakshmi 
Iyer, (For Mis. Parekh & Co.), Mahesh Agarwal, Shashank Manish, 
Himanshu Satija, E.C. Agrawala, Prateek Chadha, Ankur Kashyap, 
Raghav Chadha, Zulnoor Ali Ahmad, G. Prabhakar, Ms. Prerna Singh, 
Ms. Liz Mathew, Ms. Krishna Sarma, Avijit Roy, Navnit Kumar, Ms. 
Deepika, (For Mis. Corporate Law: Group), Naveen R. Nath, Ranjit B 
Raut, Ms. Bina Gupta, P.V. Reddy, Prashant Kr. Tyagi, (For Mis. Venkat 
Palwai Law Ass.), Venkitasubramoniam T.R., Prasanth P., C. Kannan, 
Yunus Malik, Ekansh Agarwal, Ms. Rajeeta Raj, Sanjeev Agarwal; V.G. 
Pragasam, S.P. Ramasubramanian, Seshachari, T.V. Lakshman

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.