LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

ASPINWALL AND CO. LTD. versus INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Citation: [2026] 5 S.C.R. 160 · Decided: 13-04-2026 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: RAJESH BINDAL · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2026] 5 S.C.R. 160 : 2026 INSC 359
Aspinwall and Co. Ltd.  
v. 
Inspecting Assistant Commissioner
(Civil Appeal No. 7796 of 2012)
13 April 2026
[Rajesh Bindal* and Vijay Bishnoi, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether in terms of the provisions of Kerala Agricultural Income 
Tax Act, 1991, the amalgamated company as successor of the 
amalgamating company shall be entitled to set-off of the losses 
suffered.
Headnotes†
Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991 – ss.12, 54 – Income 
Tax, 1961 – s.72A – A company named PRP amalgamated 
with the appellant company – The scheme of amalgamation 
was sanctioned in November 2006 – The appointed date was 
fixed as 01.01.2006 – There were accumulated losses in the 
balance sheet of amalgamating company – The issue is, as 
to whether the same could be claimed as a set-off against the 
income of the amalgamated company – Appellant has relied 
only on the clause 14.2 in the scheme of amalgamation – 
High Court turned down the claim of the appellants –  
Correctness:
Held: The appellant has not been able to refer to any provision 
under the Kerala Act in terms of which the losses suffered by 
amalgamating company can be set-off against the income of 
the amalgamated company – The reliance on clause 14.2 of the 
Scheme is rejected – Further, the High Court recorded that the 
loss of the amalgamating company pertained to a period beyond 
8 years, hence, in terms of s.12 of the Kerala Act the appellant 
will not be entitled to any set-off – It is a case wherein the 
appellant had lost in all fora – To challenge the aforesaid findings 
of fact recorded by the High Court in the impugned order, no 
specific ground has been raised in the petitions filed before this 
* Author
[2026] 5 S.C.R. 
161
Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner
Court – This Court does not find any merit in the present appeals.  
[Paras 14, 15]
Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991 – ss.12, 54 – Income 
Tax, 1961 – s.72A – Companies Act, 1956 – Whether the 
judgment in Dalmia Power Ltd.’s case covers the case of the 
appellant:
Held: The facts in the present case are distinguishable – Neither 
there is any statutory requirement for issuing notice to the State 
Government before any scheme of amalgamation is approved by 
the Court under the 1956 Act nor such notice was issued – Hence, 
to state that the judgment in Dalmia Power Ltd.’s case covers 
the case of the appellant, is misconceived and deserves to be 
rejected. [Para 13]
Companies Act, 1956 – s.394-A – Scope of – Discussed:
Held: s.394A of 1956 Act makes it mandatory on the Tribunal to 
issue notice in every application filed u/ss. 391 or 394 to the Central 
Government and any objections raised are to be considered – s.394 
of the aforesaid Act talks about amalgamation of the companies – 
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, had issued 
a Circular dated 15.01.2014 bearing F.No.2/1/2014 providing that 
while responding to the notices issued to the Government u/s. 
394-A, the Regional Director shall invite specific comments from 
the Income Tax Department within 15 days – If no response is 
received from the Income Tax Department during the aforesaid 
period, it may be presumed that the Income Tax Department has 
no objection to the action proposed u/ss.391 or 394, as the case 
may be – It is in the light of the aforesaid provision and the circular 
that the comments of the Income Tax Department are mandatory.
[Para12]
Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991 – ss.2(7), 2(20), 3, 
48, 54, 60 – Scope of – Discussed. [Paras 9-12]
Case Law Cited
General Radio & Appliances Co. Ltd. v. M.A. Khader, 1986 
INSCΒ 85Β : [1986] 2 SCR 607 : (1986) 2 SCC 656; Saraswati 
Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. CIT, 1990 INSC 266 : [1990] Supp. 1 
162
[2026] 5 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
SCR 332 : (1990) Supp. SCC 675; Singer India Limited v. Chander 
Mohan Chadha and Others, 2004 INSC 447 : [2004] 3 Supp. 3 
SCR 535 : (2004) 7 SCC 1; CIT v. Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd, 2019 
INSC 815 : [2019] 9 SCR 799 : (2020) 18 SCC 331; Religare 
Finvest Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2023 INSC 819 : [2023] 12 
SCR 197Β : (2024) 1 SCC 797 – referred to.
Dalmia Power Ltd. and Another v. Assistant Commissioner of 
Income-Tax, 2019 INSC 1410 : [2019] 18 SCR 1236 : (2020) 420 
ITR 339 – distinguished.
List of Acts
Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991; Income Tax, 1961; 
Companies Act, 1956; Companies Act, 2013.
List of Keywords
Amalgamation; Scheme of amalgamati

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.