LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA

Citation: [2024] 9 S.C.R. 194 · Decided: 09-09-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 9 S.C.R. 194 : 2024 INSC 674
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors 
v. 
Union of India 
(Writ Petition (Civil) No. 551 of 2024)
09 September 2024
[Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala  
and Manoj Misra, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the Court under Article 32 can issue a writ to the Union 
Government to cancel existing licences and halt the issuance of new 
licences for the export of arms and military equipments to Israel. 
Headnotes†
Constitution of India – Art. 32 – The petition seeks directions to 
the Union Government to cancel existing licences/permissions 
and to halt the grant of new licences to companies in India 
for the export of arms and military equipment to Israel during 
the ongoing conflict in Gaza:
Held: First, the conduct of an independent sovereign nation namely, 
Israel is not and cannot be made amenable to the jurisdiction of 
this Court – To consider the grant of the reliefs as sought, it would 
inevitably become necessary to enter a finding in regard to the 
allegations which have been leveled by the petitioners against the 
State of Israel – Absent jurisdiction over a sovereign State, it would 
be impermissible for this Court to entertain the grant of reliefs of 
this nature – The second aspect of the matter which requires to 
be noticed is that the petition seeks a cancellation of the existing 
licences and prohibition on the issuance of new licences for the 
export of arms and military equipments by Indian companies – Some 
of these licenses may be governed by contracts with international 
entities, including within the State of Israel – The grant of injunctive 
relief by this Court would necessarily implicate a judicial direction 
for breach of international contracts and agreements – The fall 
out of such breaches cannot be appropriately assessed by this 
Court and would lay open Indian companies which have firm 
commitments to proceedings for damages which may affect their 
own financial viability – Third, the statutory provisions of our law 
confer sufficient power on the Union Government if it decides to 
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 
195
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India  
act in such cases – For instance, prohibitions can be imposed 
by the Union of India under the Foreign Trade (Regulation and 
Development Act) as well as under the provisions of the Customs 
Act, 1962 – Whether in a given case, any such action is warranted 
is a matter which has to be decided by the Union Government 
bearing in mind economic, geo-political and other interests of the 
nation in the conduct of international relations – The self-imposed 
restraint on Courts entering into areas of foreign policy is, thus, 
grounded in sound rationale which has been applied across time – 
For the above reasons, the reliefs which have been sought in these 
proceedings are not amenable to the exercise of judicial remedies 
under Article 32 of the Constitution. [Paras 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Foreign Trade (Regulation and Development 
Act); Customs Act, 1962.
List of Keywords
Article 32 of the Constitution of India; Sovereign nation; Licenses 
for export of arms and military equipment; Permissions; Conflict 
in gaza; International law obligations; International contracts and 
agreements; International relations; Self-imposed restraints on 
Courts; Foreign Policy.
Case Arising From
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 551 of 2024
(Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India)
Appearances for Parties
Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Cheryl Dsouza, Ms. Ria Yadav, Luma Kanta 
Bhandari, Ms. Sulekha Agarwal, Prasanna S, Advs. for the Petitioners.
Barun Kumar Sinha, Mrs. Pratibha Sinha, Sneh Vardhan, Abhishek, 
Advs. for the Respondent.
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
1.	
The petition, invoking Article 32 of the Constitution, has been instituted 
by former civil servants, scholars, activists and experts in fields such 
as International Relations, Human Rights and Policy Analysis.
196
[2024] 9 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
2.	
The petition seeks directions to the Union Government to cancel 
existing licences/permissions and to halt the grant of new licences 
to companies in India for the export of arms and military equipment 
to Israel during the ongoing conflict in Gaza. These companies, as 
the petitioners describe, include a Public Sector Enterprise in the 
Ministry of Defence and private companies which have allegedly 
been granted licenses after October 2023. 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.